-6 points
Prism - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Prism:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://prismreports.org/2024/08/21/undocumented-workers-100-billion-taxes/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
30 points

They paid my welfare!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

But they took our jorbs!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Is that more than the billionaires?

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

It depends how you define “billionaire”. They may not actually make a billion dollars in income annually. With that said:

Even if you drill down to the top 400 wealthiest taxpayers — data that was publicly available on an annual basis until President Donald Trump killed the report — they paid an effective tax rate of 23.1 percent in 2014. These taxpayers — with $127 billion of income — that year paid $29.4 billion in income taxes, or more than 2 percent of all income taxes, the IRS said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/23/biden-keeps-saying-billionaires-pay-8-percent-taxes-not-really/

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Makes sense. A lot of billionaires assets are on paper, as in stocks. And the stock is effectively worthless until you sell for tax purposes. That said that is a huge difference, however I think the estimate is 11 or 12 million Undocumented in the US. Obviously not all are working.

permalink
report
parent
reply
108 points
*

Undocumented workers must be valuable to the economy. The people who employ them tend to be business owners who vote Republican, so they know the people they’re employing are creating profits, because those workers are creating profits for them.

In the early 2000s I had long conversations with a Republican-voting business owners who railed against ‘illegal immigration’, while employing them and therefore producing the conditions which incentivised them to become undocumented workers. His intellectual response was simply one of denial. He denied that his actions were hypocritical, or that he was creating the problem that he hated.

That was one of many important events that has led to me not assuming that compassion or moral integrity are commonly shown by humans.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

I’m not sure that’s true, a lot of the undocumented workers I’ve met have worked in restaurants, and MANY of the owners there are absolutely champagne socialists that push Democratic rhetoric.

Would love to see data on it, but that’s got to be hard to gather, undocumented and all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Like with everything it’s a spectrum. I’ve known republican restaurant owners who also hire undocumented people, as well as warehouse, construction and field jobs. The difference at least usually is that the left leaning owners vote in a way that would help those undocumented people vs Republicans that vote in a way that would hurt everyone that isn’t exactly like them and in plenty of cases even hurt people who are exactly like them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What he couldn’t articulate, is that his individual actions don’t have any effect the larger systemic problem.
He can’t fix anything by not hiring a dozen undocumented people.

He’s taking advantage of the problem he complains about. Which might make him a hypocrite. But nothing about the problem would change if he stopped doing either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“It doesn’t matter whether I do or do not beat my wife and children. It would still happen anyway.”

Society is all the individuals within it. Its output is the sum of all those individuals. If Republican business owners stuck to their principles and did not hire undocumented workers to make more profits, the amount of undocumented workers they are unhappy about would go down.

They are, quite literally, profiting from something they like, but then saying they don’t like it and it’s a reason to vote for shitty politicians. It’s not just hypocrisy, it’s wilfully making the world worse for other humans. Which is quite popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

“If everyone just does the right, thing instead of what’s best for them …”

That never happens. That’s not how people work.

Systemic problems need systemic solutions. Your example isn’t a systemic problem, it’s an individual one. As such it can be solved by an individual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I agree that there’s a systemic problem at the root cause of this and, of course, I agree they’re a fraction of a fraction in size.

However, I don’t think we take that attribute with any other crimes, big or small, right or wrong.

I hope we can agree that a lot of theft is a symptom of the problems caused by systemicpoverty. However, it wouldn’t excuse theft, simply because you wanted a bit more, despite already having enough.

Not just you, by any stretch of the imagination, but we’re so quick to minimise the wrong doing of wealthy people doing illegal stuff to make just a little bit more money for themselves, purely out of greed. I feel like we’ve been almost groomed into some kind of “Well that’s just good business” mentality, for this ne specific kind of law breaking.

Even if it was a starving person, we would say “I understand they’re starving. However, we also can’t have them stealing everything they want to eat from one small, family owned mini mart, all the time. Yeah, yeah, no I still think that even though doing something about it might not contribute that much to the wider, systemic issues leading to poverty.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think you’re looking at my argument too specifically.

It applies the same to climate change, and people buying cheep junkfood instead of more expensive healthy options.

Blameing people for doing what’s better for them in the moment, instead of what’s immediately difficult but ultimately better for everyone, is always wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

The people who employ them tend to be business owners who vote Republican

It’s funny how Republicans absolutely never mention the most obvious solution to the “problem” of undocumented workers: pursuing and prosecuting the American citizens who hire them. It’s always useless walls and deportations and bullshit like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because “Republican voter, punish us - your fans - for creating the problem we’re pissed off about,” just sounds ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Tiniest violin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Tax experts, economists, and union organizers say it is unfair for workers to pay into a system without a legal status to be able to reap its benefits

Wasn’t there some sort of skirmish in US history that involved the slogan “no taxation without representation”? Hmmm, what was that all about again?

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

I have a strong urge to take you to Boston to make you a cup of a warm beverage created by steeping plant leaves in hot water. I have no idea what’s going on, and I’m scared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We think about that a lot here in DC as politicians from generic Midwestern shitholes dictate local city policy to us 😭

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments