Donald Trump fired off an angry middle-of-the-night attack on “highly overrated Jewish Governor” Josh Shapiro after he spoke out against the former president at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday night.

189 points

Ah yes the strategy of trying to court jewish Americans by *checks notes* being blatantly antisemitic. There’s no real reason to mention he’s Jewish here other than to be antisemitic and imply he’s a “bad jew”

permalink
report
reply
58 points

At this point there is no chance of “court(ing)” enough voters to win. MAYBE when all anyone knew of Biden was a guy who chugged a bottle of nyquil before a debate for some reason but even america isn’t stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

If trump wins it will be because of decades of gerrymandering and outright election theft through court cases, bad faith electors, and violence.

And shit like this? This is the threat. Explain that anyone who breaks ranks is going to be just as much of a target as pence was.

Hell, I wouldn’t be shocked if we have a “Jan 6 was a day of patriotism” ad before this 70-something days is up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points
*

but even america isn’t stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

I’m afraid you’re vastly underestimating the stupidity of Americans. I just hope enough people vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They’re stupid enough when it comes to not voting at all. If everyone showed up and voted for who they prefer, no Republican would ever be president again (unless they pivot away from being the Fascist Party).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Agreed. PT Barnum was a very wealthy man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

My parents seem like normal somewhat rational people. They are still planning to vote for Trump. Please stop with this “we’ve already won” shit. It can only cost us the win. Go vote. It’s far from guaranteed. It honestly looks to be pretty close to an even race right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Please stop with this “we’ve already won” shit.

That’s not at all the right takeaway from his comment. The right takeaway from his comment is that Trump has every intention of winning by massively cheating, and his supporters are already inserting themselves into positions within the election system to do just that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
  1. Your parents are not “somewhat rational people” if they are voting for a hateful bigot and rapist who is openly compromised by foreign powers and openly talking about how people only have to vote “one more time”
  2. Please read posts before responding to them
  3. We have popular republicans speaking at the DNC and getting cheered. There was a LOT of stupidity about Biden (“He is anti-Palestine so we should let trump win instead!”) but he is gone and there is no time to make a proper attack against Kamala. trump is not going to sway additional voters and is already losing “moderates” who are desperate for anything other than a rapist lunatic who would love Gilead if he knew how to read.

That is why the focus is on strong arming his party and elected officials to remind them that he led a literal fucking lynch mob against the last republican who crossed him by… not shitting on the constitution on Jan 6.

if trump wins it is not going to be by a popular vote (it was never going to be that). It is not even going to be by barely squeaking by on the electoral college. It is going to be by getting close and then using outright theft and violence to get the rest of the way.

Which is why, even if someone is too stupid to understand that there are down ballot candidates who matter just as much (arguably moreso), they still need to vote. Because we need a landslide so that there are no elected (or military…) officials who decide that they want to be on “the winning team” and defy the will of the people. And that is who trump is campaigning to at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s a rational view, but not born out by past experience. Sadly, there are apparently a huge number of horrible Americans who still think Trump is exactly right.

Hillary got flak for calling Trump supporters a “basket of deplorables,” but in hindsight that was a kind way of saying it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

All the american zionist apartheid colonists will still support him, though, because he also hates the other people more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

Most American zionists aren’t Jewish to begin with. They’re evangelical Christians who want to ship all the Jews back to the “Holy Land” to kick-start “Armageddon” so they themselves can get “Raptured.” They don’t give a shit about Jews; they just want them gone.

They have more than enough privilege to support Trump’s hate without any risk to themselves – actually, even that is an understatement: they’re at the very core of Trump’s base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nah there’s a ton of “Israeli-Americans” who now live on stolen land:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism_as_settler_colonialism

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Wait! He can’t be antisemitic, his son in law is Jewish! /s

And he has on multiple occasions told Jews they have to have their head checked if they vote Democrat, instead of the group with tiki torches chanting about how 'Jews will not replace us". He is also currently on a KKK campaign stop tour which makes this land even better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

trump really wanted Kamala to pick this guy as VP, it’s why it’s not the first time he’s brought Shapiro up and why he even knows his name.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

Shapiro would have given him so much material to work with. He would have called him a classic coastal elite, uppity lawyer, dyed-in-the-wool career politician. He would have called him an Obama impersonator.

Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

But it’s the type of politicians the Dem party should always be running…

Kamala is doing a lot better than Biden, but someone like Walz would be doing the Super Bowl Shuffle all the way to the White House without breaking a sweat.

He’s the type of candidate our voters want, and how he went from completely unknown to ridiculously popular in like a month just shows that the “name recognition” stuff was always bullshit.

Walz isnt unique. He’s great, but there’s lots of politicians out there like him. It’s just almost impossible for them to get to the national stage when the DNC, media, billionaires, and lobbists like AIPAC want neoliberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They’ll never come out and say it openly, but I sense a strong theme in the Harris campaign of “we’re also running to give the republican party the impetus to kick Trump and his cronies to the political nothingness that they deserve to be in”

With so many people saying “I’m a republican but I’m voting for Harris”, it’s very clear that this election is just as much about Republican’s reclaiming their “grand ole’ party” from the cult of personality that has taken it over. It’s a shame that they have to literally vote with their opponent in order to make that happen. But the thought process seems to be “Let’s get dominated, spend the next four years purging ourselves of Trump and his idiotic sycophants, and then come back in the next election and fight with dignity again.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly. No one voted for Kamala. People didn’t vote for Biden, they voted against Trump. Hilary won the primary because Warren split the progressive vote and wouldn’t drop out.

Dems haven’t put forward a truly clean and charismatic leader since Obama.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

when the DNC, media, billionaires, and lobbists like AIPAC want neoliberals.

…to add insult to injury, they often play the oppression olympics game at the same time, as if 1) that kind of stupid pandering even matters to most voters, and 2) they think no one will notice their shell game. As if people cannot tell the difference between a Condaleeza Rice and a Bernie Sanders, other than gender and race?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

Republicans don’t have a counter for wholesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

No, see Walz has some huge weaknesses that Trump and Vance can expose! He, errr… [checks notes] visited China and got addicted to a video games console for a while?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That video console thing really is terrible!

Is he available for a team match, btw?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He also did IVF so he’s not a real man like jd Vance who can produce enough sperm to fill up every crevice in a discount furniture store.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

there’s no way this guy didn’t have a stroke

permalink
report
reply
49 points

But he specifically said he didn’t have a series of mini strokes, when nobody had asked. Claimed he was getting ahead of a rumor he said everybody was spreading when nobody had ever heard it.

I think that clears it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He’s going to be a handful for his handlers when the big one hits him and his face drops on one side and he is only able to move about in a wheelchair

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There will be a Q drop saying that his stroke was just pretend, and all part of a brilliant Trump plan to take down the Libs.

The Maggots will widely cheer!

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Picking a fight with another governor that has higher approval than he has in a state he must win? Please proceed, Don.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

What do they mean “goes off the rails”? The man hasn’t even seen a rail in over a decade, let alone been on one.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

He’s seen plenty of rails, just not the political kind. He’s a product of the 80’s after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He was already in mid-life in the 80s. I hardly consider that being a product of it. Motherfucker is old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

True. Point taken. I just meant that he was in his Mogul height during those years.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments