208 points

Its still a tight race in the swing states. Crazy to think anyone supports this guy. He has no respect for the country, or anyone in it. There’s so many people blindly voting against their own interests. I just don’t get it.

permalink
report
reply
142 points

25 years of organized propaganda (fox news, talk radio, etc.). I live amongst Trump supporters, they truly believe prices will come down and they will make more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points
*

my mom believes that we’re being “invaded” by illegals. i said, “stop using that term. it’s offensive and racist.”

“that’s what they are. they broke the law,” she shot back.

“and you’re offensive and racist. and i suppose that means you’re an illegal, too, since you jaywalked earlier?” I replied.

“illegal immigrants are felons!” she shouted at me.

“like Trump? so, he’s a 34-times illegal, then? and you’re voting for him?”

“that’s different!” she screamed

there’s no reasoning with these people

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

You can’t reason people out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

trump the illegal, I like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

It’s my understanding that illegally entering the country is a misdemeanor, and illegally reentering the country is a felony. It is an amplifying action for a huge number of other felonies though. Am I wrong? 8* Usc section 1325 vs 8 Usc section 1326.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Not all laws are just.

I was on a grand jury once and most of the charges were for marijuana. I tried to convince the jury we should nullify, because sending teenagers to jail for pot is cruel. No one took me up on this. (A grand jury is simple majority, and the defense has no role in the proceedings. Side note: every time a cop isn’t indicated it’s because the prosecutor didn’t want to.)

There was a little old white lady who sat behind me on the jury. She said well that’s the law and if it’s bad we should change it. Fine, I said. But imagine it’s 1950 and you’re on a trial for a black man who sat at an all white’s counter. Would you indict? Would that be the right thing to do?

She went, “oh… mm I don’t know”. And I don’t think she meant because of peer pressure or imagining she only had the perspective of a white person from the 50s. I think she was just a very Lawful-Neutral person.

Anyway. The point I was trying to get at is a lot of people have garbage moral reasoning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Fox News is absolutely one of the cause, but we can’t ignore Rush Limbaugh. He corrupted SO MANY people over the years, it’s absurd. I feel like a lot of people forget about that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

yep, racism is a helluva drug. It’s the poor brown peoples’ fault, not the billionaires who actually decide what happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Conservatives live on symbols. The Bible, the Constitution, the flag. They don’t even understand them and don’t need to because it’s really all about their emotions. They are in it to win and to feel confident, not to rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Team sports.

“My team win, your team lose.”

The extent of their thought process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

this is why high school pep rallies were invented-- it takes a special kind of stupid to bleat about “individual liberty” while pledging your soul to a party of collectivist ultranationalism which “others” everyone who doesn’t toe the line

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

More like if their team win EVERYONE loses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Nobody asked him to run in 2016… he only did because he thought he could hustle the donation process to pay back his debts to Russia, but then the whole of GOP decided to back him, because who else could they unite on?

GOP is a coalition of people who can only find common ground with others on the absolutely lowest common denominator. Trump is just that. The uninvited but seemingly popular stranger at a party where everyone hates each other.

The look on his face when he won… He never intended to win. Now he has to, because he fucked up, and will need the power to dodge the consequences…

If Democrats win it is clear that the GOP party is fucking over. They might actually break up into different directions if they lose hard enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

no respect for the country, or anyone in it.

that’s why those people love trump. because the venn diagram of people he hates somewhat overlaps the circle of people they hate. and since they’re stupid, it doesn’t even matter that they are themselves within the circle of people trump hates

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kind of like Hitler saying “We kill all non-Blonde haired blue eye’d Aryan Germans” and then the Japanese were like “May we join in?”

If Hitler had won, there would have been a Nazi/German War sometime in the 60s, after he sent all the Russians to concentration camps, and taken over all of Russia.

Granted, I’m veering off into alternate history, but you can see my point, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

why turn to alternate history when actual history works just fine?

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.

https://phdn.org/archives/www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/documents/osssection3pt1.htm

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

I think the World in general would be better off if Trump loses.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Not just Trump, the entire GOP needs to take a serious, undeniable shellacking this election cycle. The sort of loss that forces them, and it won’t be easy, to do some serious introspection regarding the future existence of their party. We will need to force them to lose so badly that they’re toxicity is blatant, absolutely radioactive. At all levels from city dog catcher on up. If Harris/Walz doesn’t have a sympathetic Congress they won’t be able to pull our proverbial bacon out of the fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yup. I’m no republican, but the country would be better if they jettison the rightmost christiofascist wing of the party to the fringe that they are.

Again not that I’m seeking it, but a more centrist “sane, sober” republican party would be a real challenge for centrist democrats to contend with.

It’s like they’re currently in a ketamine induced fugue state. Some day, maybe still a few years from now, the record is gonna stop and they’ll realize the palin-jones-trump arc has run it’s course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Who is the Jones in the palin-jones-trump arc?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m crossing my fingers that Florida flips, because IF Florida flips there’s a really good chance Texas flips too. At least I hope so, based on the trends in the polls. But then it’ll be a real landslide 🌊

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If that happens, Harris would probably win by a larger nationwide margin than Obama 2008. Not holding out for that.

It is interesting that Florida and Texas have about the same margin in polls, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

There is no amount of introspection that could accomplish that, especially due to a mere election loss. At this point, the GOP is an amalgam of a cult and a criminal conspiracy that’s so far down the deep end of fascism that nothing short of being dismantled by the DOJ under racketeering and/or insurrection charges or being defeated militarily will put it off its current path.

I mean, if you can think of any organization in history similar to Trump’s MAGA GOP that has rehabilitated itself without externally-applied force or violence, I’d love to hear it 'cause it would make me feel more hopeful. I, for one, don’t know that it’s ever happened any time in human history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Question is…if Trump loses in 2024, does the GOP let him run AGAIN in 2028? Because I’d be fine if he keeps running, and keeps losing. And the 2028 race would presumably be against Harris. So I’d LOVE for him to lose twice to a black woman. Just because I know HE cares so much about gender and race, and it would be the one thing that would crush his poor little ego.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I strongly suspect his dementia-riddled brain will be too far gone for another run in 4 years. Hope so anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They would ABSOLUTELY let him run again in '28 if he wanted to. They won’t like it but those chickenshits are too cowardly to stand up to him. He is single handedly ruining the GOP and I’m here for it.

They used to be able to deny or explain away their racism, sexism, xenophobia, and corruption, but Trump has forced them to go full mask off. They can’t deny it anymore and neither can anyone else who still calls themselves a Republican. I’m begging the universe to let this motherfucker run again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

So they created a monster and the monster is now out of control. What a surprise, huh?

Well, I’ve got something to tell you: fuck you and all your shitty GOP. If you didn’t see this coming, you only deserve an absolute defeat and disappearing into oblivion.

But what’s actually happening here is not that. No, what’s happening here is that your fucking party got so unhinged (by your own hands) that only the most deranged people are willing to vote for you, and that’s scary, right? That’s scary because there are not enough wackos to make you win an election, and now you’re really fearing the fact that you might be losing elections for generations thanks to all the damage your monster did to yourselves.

Well, you know what? I’m glad. I’m happy you’re so fucked right now that you prefer losing an election over winning it because of how much damage the win can do to yourselves.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

What’s crazy is they aren’t saying that Trump is too extreme, they are complaining that he isn’t extreme enough.

If Trump gets in, we set back the pro-life cause and free markets by a generation at least

They are mad that he’s not campaigning on a total abortion ban and complete federal government shutdown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Everyone will be better off if Trump loses. Billionaires, Republicans, progressives, climate activists, Wall Street bankers, and congresspeople of every party.

Trump’s second term will be a Project 2025-enabled attempt to simply destroy the United States government and inflame a civil war in order to keep MAGA in power forever. I guess under the assumption that it’ll work smoothly and everything will continue as normal after, just with MAGA people in charge of the magically-still-working-smoothly machinery of the country?

It’s like those people who bought plane tickets to January 6th, thinking they would go there and violently overthrow the transfer of power and kill any congresspeople that stood in the way of it, and then they could go home and show up to work with Trump now in power and everything would go back to normal.

It’s naive to the point of absurd self delusion. And roughly 95% of our media and government is going along with the delusion. Anything reporting on “Trump is ahead in polls in Wisconsin” instead of “Trump wants to kill anyone who opposes him and destroy the Department of Education and deploy the military against any domestic opposition” is feeding into the comforting cognitive dissonance that things will be within the normal parameters if Trump wins and abortion or “the economy” will be on the table as issues, and not “what can we do to get water and charge my phone today” and “which side’s forces is my governor on the side of”.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Fact check:

Claim: Everyone will be better off if Trump loses

Verdict: False. Trump will not be better off if he loses

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Counterpoint: he might die throwing a tantrum after losing.

We can’t talk to the dead, how can we say for sure he’s not better that way?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well he might not go down in history as the guy that destroyed American democracy. That might be a good outcome in the long run

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s like those people who bought plane tickets to January 6th, thinking they would go there and violently overthrow the transfer of power and kill any congresspeople that stood in the way of it, and then they could go home and show up to work with Trump now in power and everything would go back to normal.

Do you remember when armed militants invaded the Malheur wildlife refuge in Oregon, setting up what was sure to be a long, violent standoff with police and military?

2 weeks in, they arrested one of them. He’d taken a stolen ranger truck to get supplies at Safeway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Thank you. It boggles my mind how almost everybody’s just whistling past the graveyard on this!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s naive to the point of absurd self delusion. And roughly 95% of our media and government is going along with the delusion.

I think everyone paying attention is fatigued by everything being the end of the world. Trump fetishists aren’t going to change their minds and everyone who sees the danger he represents don’t need to be told. The sky has been falling for eight years with Trump and so far nothing has even slowed him down (aside from the 2020 loss).

We’re almost done. Trump does not have another run in him. He’s half crazed now, by 2028 he’ll have his hands full dealing with the dementia. All that matters is that he loses. If Kamala wins, Trump is no longer America’s problem.

Personally I’m more concerned with what’s going on in red state governments and their efforts to pass heinous laws that will get challenged to the supreme court and erode the rights of all Americans. Unless Kamala expands the court of the house impeaches some justices, it doesn’t really matter who is in the oval office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

It goes to show how republicans are cowards. They don’t want the wrath of MAGAs so they nominate him hoping he’d just lose and go away.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

They also know that with no Trump, they lose all the crazies, and the crazies are the only thing even keeping them in the game right now. So they pandered to them, and drove away all the vaguely normal Ron Swanson types who might have voted for them in the dim and distant past.

They need to go away, and regroup, and come back with something that isn’t… this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 416K

    Comments