Seems to me that there might have been a better way to handle this.

27 points

Librarians don’t make shit, and basically the only reason to be a librarian is because you believe in what libraries stand for.

If they’re closing during those hours, they probably genuinely don’t think they have a choice.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

The move came after a year in which library staff complained about rampant misbehavior among rowdy teenagers at the library, Strezo said, including reports of teens lighting firecrackers, getting into fights, and disturbing peers who had come to study or relax after a long day at school.

There is a better way: parents can teach their kids fucking manners. Clearly some of them know how to behave in public, so why are the rest being such little shits?

permalink
report
reply
17 points

That’s hardly an actionable policy suggestion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Indeed, it’s not a policy issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I disagree. Setting aside my feelings on the policy, a behavior occurred, a policy was enacted, a behavior was changed. Making it objectively a policy issue.

Your desire for it not to be a policy issue seems to be the driving factor for why you don’t think it’s a policy issue. Seems like circular reasoning.

Maybe I’m missing something though, I’m open to elaboration on why curtailing misbehavior on public grounds with a policy is not a policy issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I get where you’re coming from, but I think anything concerning human behavior and how they use the services absolutely is a policy issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Strezo said librarians had asked for more staff and better security measures, but haven’t gotten either.

Another group, much like educators, failed by our shit society.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I’m willing to bet that if I had rolled into a library and started tossing firecrackers around, I would have been arrested. There is a problem with petty crime on public property; why is there not a police presence? The reason the assholes keep doing this is because they don’t experience any consequences, and just closing the doors isn’t a consequence.

That would be the reactionary part of an appropriate solution. The preventative part would be to only allow library access to people over 18 with ID (at least during the hours they’ve instead decided to close the doors to everyone), unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

In general librarians are looking out for their communities the best they can with the meager resources provided. Libraries barely get funding to keep in books, much less security guards and lawyers. Who would enforce the age gating? Maybe it’s an acab type of town, and closing the library for a spell is safer than calling the police. From the article they planned to put cameras in the library, which would help find-out come home to it’s fuck-around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Heck with some of our fellow Americans these days… causing a closure would be the entire point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Libraries

!libraries@literature.cafe

Create post

For talk of all things related to libraries!

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

Community stats

  • 452

    Monthly active users

  • 89

    Posts

  • 261

    Comments

Community moderators