- Former President Trump defended his actions regarding the 2020 election, claiming he had the right to interfere and criticizing the charges against him as politically motivated.
- Trump argued that the legal actions against him set a bad precedent and accused prosecutors of bias, specifically mentioning federal charges and a Georgia case involving alleged election interference.
- The Harris-Walz campaign condemned Trump’s remarks, stating that he is pushing false narratives and emphasizing Vice President Harris’s commitment to upholding the rule of law.
So a confession then?
The fool is deluded beyond redemption
Trump argued that the legal actions against him set a bad precedent
Well, we finally agree on something.
The fact that he’s a free man and the republican nominee 4 years after attempting to steal an election and then subsequently attempted a coup is a really fucking bad precedent and shows that the legal system is impotent to stop large scale corruption.
Well. He’s wrong.
Sounds like a confession.
We finally got him, right guys? Guys?
Sounds like he’s setting up a defense as it being an official presidential act and thus him being immune from prosecution based on the blanket immunity that SCOTUS recently gave to presidents. So he’ll admit to it, be immune, and let everyone else get prosecuted for knowingly following him.