The judge overseeing Donald J. Trump’s criminal case in Manhattan postponed his sentencing until after Election Day, a significant victory for the former president as he seeks to overturn his conviction and win back the White House.

In a ruling on Friday, the judge, Juan M. Merchan, rescheduled the sentencing for Nov. 26. He had previously planned to hand down Mr. Trump’s punishment on Sept. 18, just seven weeks before Election Day, when Mr. Trump will face off against Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidency.

While the decision will avert a courtroom spectacle in the campaign’s final stretch, the delay itself could still affect the election, keeping voters in the dark about whether the Republican presidential nominee will eventually spend time behind bars.

MBFC
Archive

17 points

The intent here is probably to avoid MAGA riots before the election.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

My bet would be that it’s to avoid influencing the election rather than riots.

Whichever sentence he gives, it has the potential to make him more likely to win, thereby undermining the sentence.

Personally, I’d like to see justice happen in a way that can be blind to that outside context, but we don’t live in that world.

I don’t like it, but I get it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

it’s to avoid influencing the election

He’s already been found guilty and nobody seems to care one way or the other. What’s sentencing going to change?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

A prison sentence looks way more like political suppression than just “guilty but still speaking publicly”.

Still don’t think it was the right thing to do, but I can see why a judge who has otherwise seemed same and nonpartisan would be inclined to make that choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

So, in other words, the courts are bowing to terrorists. Great precedent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

That’s not a very good reason or justification to delay.

If that worries the justice system, then Trump can never be sentenced. He has cult followers for life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I believe it is a good enough reason to delay sentencing.

Am I happy with it? Ofc not. But I do understand that nobody wants the orange’s followers rioting and murdering people in the run-up to the election.

Let the election happen and then all the focus can be on his sentencing (25+ years is my wish).

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Government capitulation to threats or concerns of a violent mob, is always bad idea. It only serves to embolden the mob.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Why wait until 2 weeks after election? Just to be sure to not give jail time if he wins?

I’m fucking tired of this two tiered justice system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So, extortion. Cool. Justice waits for cowards, what a country I live in…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

A few years back, I would have said that they are trying to uphold the image of democracy. “Vote for Harris, a guy you’ve never heard of or this criminal, your choice” isn’t a good look… sad that we ended up here anyway.

Probably also trying to avoid the headache of “what happens when a candidate is sent to prison”. That’s either going to be a lot of work for you or someone you know higher up, who isn’t going to like that paperwork, especially such a high profile case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

It’s a shame this man’s right to a speedy trial are being subverted here.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Defendants can always waive that right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Everyone going “This is for the best, that way he can’t easily appeal” are on lethal doses of copium. This man is never going to see the inside of a prison.

I’m rooting for a blood clot, embolism or aneurysm instead.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

What if you could have that and him in prison too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Fuck him, he doesn’t deserve a quick way out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He doesn’t, but how much time would you spend futilely trying to torment the tapeworm inside your intestines before simply swallowing the vermicide and be done with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He doesn’t, but we do deserve to have him gone in an instant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

It doesn’t keep the voters in the dark about anything. It further cements the fact that nobody with any power to do so is willing to actually hold Trump accountable for the many crimes he has committed. It has been 4 fucking years since he has been president and 8 fucking years since this specific crime was committed. They should have sentenced him immediately after conviction like any normal convicted criminal. I guarantee if he gets elected he won’t get sentenced, so why postpone sentencing?

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

It is actually normal for sentencing to take a while after conviction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The sentencing will definitely happen, it’s a state level case and he’s already been found guilty. There’s nothing almost anyone can do to stop the process from continuing at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

You bet that if he wins, it won’t. Notice the strategically selected November 18, just 2 weeks after to be sure it is certain.

I know if it state, but if he wins it will be delayed or it will be also in the wrist. If delayed and he gets actual jail time, he will use military to stop it.

Anyway since Merchan did this delay it is now certain that what the sentence is will depend on the election.

They showing us clearly that the law only applies the plebs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He could get a pardon from the governor, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve been disappointed each and every time something gets delayed, but at this point I think I’m willing to acknowledge that it is perhaps best for everyone is Trump is sentenced after the election.

If he were to go to jail now you’d never hear the end of it. As though the US was stolen by the radical left, imprisoning political opponents et cetera. Obviously that’s not a narrative based in reality, but it would be the prevailing narrative amongst conservatives none the less.

The republicans would fall inline behind someone equally repulsive, if just a tiny bit more electable.

The best way forward for everyone is for him to lose convincingly in November, and then send his ass to proper jail with no twitter or diapers et cetera.

On a prison diet with no prospects he will become frail and irrelevant in a matter of weeks. Even his own children wouldn’t bother to visit because jail is icky and their bread is already buttered really. It’s the outcome he deserves and I would very much like to see it.

This is the only way the republican party would dial back the weirdness.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

This is the only way the republican party would dial back the weirdness.

Completely collapsing as a party is another option, which in my mind leads to a better outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments