194 points

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Oh wow this meme being used for a good thing. Maybe the darkest timeline is brightening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
161 points

Underestimate Swifties at your peril. Live Nation-Ticketmaster has been a loathed monopoly for years and they screwed up one Taylor Swift sale and there were Congressional hearings and a lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice joined by 30 states’ Attorneys General.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Indeed. I’m delighted that LN/TM is finding out after fucking around so much for so long.

On an unrelated note, props for the usage of the correct plural form 🍻

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

for real? Where can I read more details about it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

So lazy lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This isn’t Google, it’s a social media site. It’s just people talking to other people, dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It is in Taylor Swift’s best interest for Kamala to win. Trump will stop these investigations. Kamala will likely continue them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-88 points

Taylor Swift sucks almost as much as the people who like her music.

I don’t actually think that but I’d rather see that than all this ‘taylor swift fans are the mightiest force in the universe’ crap good lord. Causes headaches on account of all the involuntary spastic eye rolling.

Kpop too lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

It’s not so much a special capacity of swifties, but that they’re probably the only large unified bloc anywhere on the electoral left. I like them because they’re a large enough group of progressive liberals to prove that a unified front is absolutely effective

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

Being fan of a spoiled billionare who charges thousand for a gig and who takes 40 seconds private jets flights to avoid traffic jams is quite right wing and conservative mentality if you ask me

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

We get it, you’re too cool for popular stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

For some reason you’re applying some moral attachment to something that is purely about the size of the group.

Her endorsement is powerful because of the numbers of people it drove to voter registration, and therefore some significant percentage of them to actually vote. Not because she’s awesome, or good, or whatever you’re upset about

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

do you know anything about her or do you hate her because she’s Taylor Swift? she actually seems to be an empathetic and good person. i don’t listen to her music, but that doesn’t stop me from recognizing her values.

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

This is simultaneously wonderful and depressing.

permalink
report
reply
107 points

If this is what it takes to get the 18-30 year olds to the polls in the right states, idgaf. Just win, baby!

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Oh absolutely, by any means necessary. Which is why I say it’s wonderful.

But it’s disheartening that a celeb endorsement can drive such engagement. Might be dating myself here but it always reminds me of “what does Ja Rule think!?!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I’d argue this isn’t any celebrity though. Say what you will about Taylor and her music but she has successfully marketed herself as a wholesome role model for younger generations who has ran a nearly 20 year career scandal free. To them she represents more than celebrity fame. She’s a movement and if she says vote they will vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not to mention, there’s senate and house seats countrywide that could be won with these people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

My first vote might have been because of free coffee at Starbucks for I Voted stickers. In other words, it can always be dumber ;p

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ha, that’s pretty good! Thanks for the perspective.

I’ve voted in every election for which I’ve been eligible, so I wonder if some of my votes were just to keep the streak alive even if only subconsciously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I mean, some of them are like that. I’ve voted every time since, and I maybe my proudest, silliest vote was for Obama in the primary. I was, what, 20, and just really not that into Hillary mostly because she scapegoated video games. Obama ended up being a very good choice, but that reason was definitely immature young adult brain. (Vibe probably mattered, too, now that I think of it).

Honestly, dissing video games was not the best reason to get me to vote against her but like, you know how rare it is for as young person to vote in a primary? Small things like that can matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Right there with ya. The fact that this is a thing in our society is just… I’ll take it, but yikes. Glad she didn’t endorse trump I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

how much of a shit did you give about the crusty old white people in government when you were 10-18 yrs old?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

10-18? I dont think that’s the age group we are discussing here…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

As a punk kid living in the world of Reagan, I cared a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

All but the 18 year olds can’t vote.

That being said, I was 16 on 9/11 so my cohort got into politics very quickly. Especially as most of my good friends were into punk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My first thought was “imagine if Putin could have afforded her”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Whatever your opinion of her/Swifties, this is ultimately good news.

permalink
report
reply
-107 points

Is it? They are bringing votes to a political party who is supporting a genocide where more than 40k people died so far, many of them are children.

Imagine if they brought hundreds of thousands votes to a third party or imagine if they would use the same leverage to boycott private jets or discouraging consumerism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Yeah, Trump presidency would definitely not cause thousands to die.

Link totally irrelevant https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/10/us-coronavirus-response-donald-trump-health-policy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-44 points

If red and blue have both the blood of thousand innocents on their hands a good news would be a celebrity with millions of followers endorsing a third party

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

They are bringing votes to a political party who is supporting a genocide where more than 40k people died so far, many of them are children.

It would be no different under the alternative administration. Probably worse actually. There is a very good reason that Iran created a plot to kill Trump and continues to hammer on influencing against Trump. https://www.npr.org/2024/07/16/nx-s1-5042424/trump-iran-plot

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

There aren’t two parties, if celebrities would endorse third parties perhaps you would hear about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I saw your history and eww. Just gonna hit that ol block button

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 471K

    Comments