-3 points

And yet for years sports fans have enjoyed themselves.

Christ you fuckers are pushy.

IT’S NOT FOR YOU. GET OVER IT.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Elitist twat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Lolol YOU’RE (royal) the one constantly telling Madden fans how dumb they are. 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The fuck are you talking about, they do that themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can get cheaper tickets to a real game.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Let’s say you score a 20$ ticket to a 3.5 hour game. That comes to $5.7 per hour of entertainment. Meanwhile, this game at $70 means you only need to put in 12.5 hours of playtime to get the equivalent, and after you can continue to play as much as you want unlike the in-person ticketed experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

lol have you seen ticket prices lately?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Maybe nosebleeds at a bottom 5 NFL team, and even that is questionable. Football tickets are very expensive these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

No game should be 70$ if you ask me

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Games should not follow inflation at all?

N64 games were 50$ in the 90s, more limited releases (Ogre Battle 64 for example) were 60$.

Games pricing has stagnated, that’s good for the consumers but bad for smaller developers…

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Surely the difference in overheads involved in physical vs digital would mean profits are increasing at a higher rate then sale price

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Maybe, development cost hasn’t gone down though, not one bit!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not really.

Optical discs are dirt cheap. This old answer from Quora says physical media (disc, case, artwork, inserts, etc) accounted for $2-$5 of the cost of a game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you’re going to count in inflation then I’m going to count in the poor quality of those games

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Rose tinted glasses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
  1. The medium games came in were more expensive

  2. The gaming audience was much smaller

  3. Games were only sold in stores

  4. If you add all the season passes you’re paying the same or even more with further microtransactions

  5. Games in general now have a longer shelf life

AAA games in my country have been 69,99€ since the PS3 launch and now they’re asking 79,99€. It’s true development costs have ballooned, but I just don’t think that’s a good price/time ratio and rarely do I buy games over 15€. I really don’t mind waiting a couple years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Bad price/time ratio? I don’t know many hobbies where you’ll spend that kind of money for 100h+ of enjoyment…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

New releases used to be £40 when I was a kid (twenty years ago), given inflation, £70 sounds not too bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That $40 included plastic packaging and a disc both of which largely don’t exist anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Never was a significant cost. So complaining, you are never going to get you 50c of plastic to burn down the planet to spite publishers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Those cost pennies. They were never part of the cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

And a complete game!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

40? I remember when they were 20. Hell, I remember when you could get slightly older titles for 10. I used to go to Egghead and buy slightly older games with my allowance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

No you don’t. You are just imagining. At no point ever was $20 typical for a new game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

more importantly they sell way more units now. It takes virtually no more effort or cost for gaming companies to sell 20 million units vs 1 million.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If they’re selling 20 million more units than they used to, then $70 clearly is not too much and outs this post as nothing more than a moan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Tears of the Kingdom was $70, and I honestly feel like it was worth it because it’s quite an entertaining and enthralling experience.

“Pro football video game v. 34” is probably not in the same caliber though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

TofK could be the best game ever made (and I don’t think it’s too far fetched given how good it is) and I still wouldn’t justify anything bigger than 50€, 60€ being generous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Depends on the playtime you get out of it. 140hrs+? Great value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have devoted that amount of hours or even more to some games and still think the 40-50€ that costed me each one of them when I bought them is too much.

Entertainment shouldn’t be that expensive. Period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I don’t agree. Development costs money and I’m willing to pay for it. I usually compare it to other daily things, such as nice restaurant visits or such. Things costs money.

Just because I’m curious, what would you feel to be a fair price for one of those games?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you were fine paying $50 15 years ago then I don’t see why you would complain about paying $70 now. That’s just inflation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I dunno. Baldurs Gate 3 has a truly unbelievable amount of content in it. $70 for it is almost unfair when you consider how far $70 gets you in almost any other hobby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Someone told me something similar about Tears of the Kingdom and my answer is the same: BG3 could be the greatest game ever made with content from here to eternity, but 70$ is still too much for a game. Specially considering who ends up benefitting the most from the sales.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That makes zero sense. Explain why BG3 is not worth $70. Give me real data showing that. How much should it cost considering how many people worked on it and how much was spent developing it?

It takes 75 - 100 hours to beat the game, and that’s just one play through and that one play through can take even longer depending on play style. This is the kind of game people can get several hundred or thousands of hours out of. Show me any other hobby where you can spend $70 one time and get hundreds of hours of enjoyment.

Hell, even if you sped through the game as fast as possible and spent 50 hours (made up number, not sure what a speedy play through takes), that’s still a LOT of time for the money spent. Take an uber out to a movie with friends, then go to a restaurant, then uber back home and you’ll have bought at least two copies of BG3, yet you got a few hours of entertainment.

There are next to no other forms of entertainment that give give you that many hours for your money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
137 points
*

then don’t buy it

people keep buying it, so why wouldn’t they raise the price?

permalink
report
reply
73 points

Typical moron gamer moment, though: Bitch about price, buy it anyway, leave a bad review at 500 hours played, and repeat next year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

They named this pathology The Maddening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Now that FIFA’s gone, EA needs another cash cow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Fifa isn’t gone, only the FIFA in-game branding is gone. It’s just called FC24 instead of FIFA 24.

And most of the world that plays FIFA isn’t going to play an American football game. American football is completely different and not relatable to pretty much anyone except those from USA (or maybe Canada, dunno).

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

It’s a free market. Just don’t buy it

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.1K

    Posts

  • 86K

    Comments