256 points

She needs to still show up as scheduled, say that just because trump won’t make time for the American people doesn’t mean she will ignore them

Either he takes the bait and shows up, or she dominates the news cycle now, before the debate, during the debate, and after it

The whole time trump won’t be able to talk about anything besides the debate and how it’s not “fair”.

It’s the common sense move, so I’ll be surprised to see it, but I hope they do.

permalink
report
reply
123 points

Make it a town hall. We really do need to hear questions and answers of serious topics now that the clown has left the big top.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

This is a far better option. Holding a debate without the other candidate is fodder for Trump to do the same on ONN or Fox News. But holding a town hall and inviting Trump as an optional attendee would create engagement, and either Trump will ignore it, join the same one, or hold his own and most likely screw up his own.

Win, win, win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

He’d hold his own to a “town” of handpicked shills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

The moderator should also ask the empty podium the same question they just asked Harris, with a brief pause to emphasize that he is a no-show.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Nah, I’m tired of modern Dems acting like Republicans from a decade ago…

https://i.huffpost.com/gen/1167376/images/o-CLINT-EASTWOOD-EMPTY-CHAIR-facebook.jpg

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Most of the commenters calling for Harris to do this were probably in elementary school 10 years ago🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

it’s not like the filming of empty podiums is ahistorical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just treat the debate as normal, but they just swap to the empty podium where Trump should have been.

After the debate they say Trump showed a marked improvement this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Clint Eastwood tried that and it was cringey as fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Talking to a chair awkwardly is not at all what’s being suggested here

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

She needs to still show up as scheduled, say that just because trump won’t make time for the American people doesn’t mean she will ignore them

That reminds of the 2020 presidential election in Poland when both candidates did exactly what you describe - they debated at the same time but in separate studios. And the story how it came to that is wild.

This was after the first round of the elections (where two candidates are selected for the second round), which involved things like last-minute rescheduling of the elections, last-minute candidate swap and effectively throwing away 20 million dollars of public money. Currently there are several criminal investigations conducted against people involved in organisation of that first round. And of course it was all in the middle of the pandemic. So the political chaos was at its absolute peak.

The two candidates were the country’s president representing then ruling party and capital city’s mayor representing then biggest opposition party. Both of course wanted the debate. The issue was that then ruling party turned the public broadcaster into a party propaganda machine compared by experts to that created by Goebbels. And the core of that propaganda was that the second biggest (private) broadcaster in Poland (owned by Discovery Group) is anti-Polish and cannot be trusted.

Both broadcasters offered they can organise the debate. The private one I believe was also willing to jointly host it. But the ruling party candidate couldn’t agree to a debate hosted by the private broadcaster because that would significantly impact the propaganda and expose his many wrongdoings to the manipulated ruling party voters.

On the other hand, the opposition candidate couldn’t agree for the debate hosted only by the public broadcaster because that would effectively be 2 hours of him trying to deny lies spread by hosts and the other candidate.

The 2nd round was coming close and no compromise has been found. So on the same day the two broadcasters prepared their studios for two candidates with audience. Ruling party candidate went to public broadcaster, opposition candidate to private one. Both declared the other as a “no-show” and proceeded to have a “debate” with hosts and audience.

Few days later the opposition candidate lost by a small margin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What a clown show

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just bait him more by attacking his ego

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

I agree. Trump did a townhall when Harris didn’t show up to the first proposed the debate, she should do a townhall to replace the next one if Trump ultimately does not show. It’d be a great way to quell complaints that she is afraid of speaking to the media or press as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

To qualify as a proposed debate it would have to be a proposal that a reasonable bystander would take seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
190 points

Reminder.

Back before the 2016 Conventions Trump challenged Bernie Sanders to a debate. Bernie jumped at the chance and Cadet Bonespurs had to run away from his own challenge.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/no-show-trump-now-says-debate-sanders-would-be-inappropriate-n581826

permalink
report
reply
89 points
*

Trump is on tape telling people in the room that the only person he’s afraid of is Sanders.

Fast forward to now and he’s apparently added Harris to that list. It’s beautiful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Bernie can control a room on power of pure charisma, force of personality and personal authority in a way few people are capable of. Just watch his Fox News town hall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

That’s a weird way to spell “objectively good policy.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
141 points

Brave Sir Donald ran away. Bravely ran away away!

permalink
report
reply
49 points

I didn’t! You’re lying!

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

When danger reared its ugly head, he cravenly turned his tail and fled

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Yes, brave Sir Donald turned about and gallantly, he chickened out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

permalink
report
reply
78 points

“Rejects”

Retreats in fear

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Brave sir Donald

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Brave Sir Donald ran away.
Bravely ran away, away!
When danger reared its ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes, brave Sir Donald turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat,
Bravest of the brave, Sir Donald!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Panda express…

Because he’s an orange chicken

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments