4 points

To me everything seems to point to the fact that community developed distros, even if funded by corporations, seems to be the best option moving forward.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Ugh, fuck it. I’m transitioning my developers to straight-up Debian. I don’t need this shit.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

From what i get,

It seems like they are pissed at oracle specifically,
Selling a oracle branded rhel clone with minor tweaks and a oracle certified sticker.

And the other downstream distros are just collateral damage.

Obviously wouldn’t make it better
(But imo more understandable)

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The literal point of GPL is that Oracle is explicitly entitled to do exactly that. You don’t own the code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We had this already with mongodb, Elastic search and AWS. It’s not sustainable to give away your work to your competitors so they can make the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then just write proprietary code. Open source philosophy to me seems about creation for a “greater good”. What’s the point if you’re not even going to be open? The organisation just becomes a massive corporation like any other at that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not surprising that RHEL is now trashing every FLOSS license it’s beholden to. They’ve violated the licenses and I genuinely someone over at GNU or something gets to goosing them with lawyers.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

They’ve violated the licenses

Did they? Because as far as I know they’re complying with the GPL and other licenses, since everybody that gets their RHEL license (and the software/binaries) also gets the sources. Or am I mistaken?

I don’t think the license says ‘grant everybody a copy of your source code’, only the ones that actually bought access to the binaries RHEL provides

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s fine, it’s the threats about terminating support agreements or dev accounts if you redistribute the source code that’s stepping really close or over the line. The license gives you the right (and in some cases the responsibility) to redistribute.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, thats just it. I realize people are at the least annoyed, but this was always in the books. It wasn’t guaranteed they would go this way, but the page was there and they decided to finally flip to it. After the centos things, it was really a matter of time

You should have migrated from RH a long time. They aren’t with this breaking any licenses. Hurting souls and hearts, yes, but not licenses

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well now, this could be Arch Linux’s moment to shine.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Yes, because I too would definitely use a rolling release disto on a production machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

that was the joke!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh, whoops…

Prime example of Poe’s Law, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 82K

    Comments