57 points

I get pictures of my friends’ pets and food. Oh boy. And, of course, mountains and mountains of ads and right wing propaganda. So, mostly nazis, but sometimes kittens.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

And, very very rarely…nazi kittens

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Do we have kitler community here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

catboy hitler…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

If the product is free, the user is the product

permalink
report
reply
48 points

No, the adverts are the product.

This whole notion that nothing can be free needs to get in the bin.

Linux is free. Who’s selling the user data for that?

Lemmy is free, who’s the product there?

Yes, Facebook/Meta is a shady fucking company and they are indeed selling your data on top of the ads they sell, but don’t lump everything free into the same bucket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, Linux really is just like a traditional product were the user pays to get their get their use cases supported. Except they’ve short-circuited the whole paying thing to where users directly hire people for the work (for the most part).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Dude you’re tripping

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well said

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Neither Linux nor Lemmy are a multi-billion dollar company.

If the advertisements were the product, then the exchange would be give ad, receive money. The advertisers are both giving the ad and the money to Meta. The thing the advertisers receive for giving the money are the potential customers. Meta is exchanging money for users. You are the product.

Meta’s entire model is categorizing the users so effectively and giving the advertisers the tools to target the users who are most likely to spend money once they see the ad. The advertisers pay Meta for access to users as well as the data about all of the different ways that groups of users are categorized. Then the advertiser can make a new ad or new product that will appeal to either a wider audience, an audience that is willing to pay a far larger amount of money than something costs to produce, or both.

The users and their data are the product of nearly every profitable business that provides something free to users. It’s up to you to decide how you feel about that. Maybe you see an ad for something and think “That’s exactly what I’ve been looking for!” and happily pay for it. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Wait… I’m not paying for Lemmy…

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Then who tf have I been paying $3.50 a month to for Lemmy Prime+?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Goddamn Loch Ness Monster. Stop asking people for money for lemmy+, folks came here to look at nature, not get pestered with your subscription model!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Also not paying for LibreOffice, Linux and Gimp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’re not paying but someone is. The servers aren’t running for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think this applies to non-profit stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

… Fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s taking your milk for dairy product replacements

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If y’all still have gmails, take a look at proton mail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

only if you’re into LLM features and crypto wallets (it’s a recent change)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No idea how this is related to my comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
4 points

Truly utopian, finally a drug to rule them all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Heroin is so much better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You get to use it for free instead of paying $20 a month.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Which is ironic because if they mixed to a subscription no one would use it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wouldn’t go as far as to claim no one would

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Xitter did it, it’s only a matter of time til the inshittification is complete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Twitter is still free to use as always.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Same as TV has done for 70 years and radio for a 100.

You get entertainment, the company sells your attention. If you don’t like it you don’t use it.

Exactly the same model as reddit as well, with the addition of useless internet points in exchange of content to fuel the entertainment.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yep, even if the amount of data harvested wasn’t on the same level as TV, advertising still brings in money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This isn’t exactly corollary.

FB isn’t just selling ad space, they’re literally selling user data, often to adversarial countries.

Radio could never do that, and tv only could if you had a paid service like cable or satellite.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 75K

    Comments