18 points

How Jacob felt after posting that

permalink
report
reply

Post Hoc, West Wing Propter Hoc 2

permalink
report
parent
reply

mr couch fucker your fired sir

permalink
report
reply
26 points

In the discourse, a heckler’s veto is a situation in which a party who disagrees with a speaker’s message is able to unilaterally trigger events that result in the speaker being silenced. For example, a heckler can disrupt a speech to the point that the speech is canceled.

How is Vance - despite his being a well educated idiot - not describing a heckler’s veto?

permalink
report
reply
37 points

I’ve never heard this term before, but I think the key phrase is “party who disagrees with a speaker’s message.” Presumably, the people calling in bomb threats are on the same page as Vance, so they’re not hecklers, and any pressure on Vance to stop is an unintended side effect. If people were calling in bomb threats to Vance’s rallies, that’d be a heckler’s veto.

Ultimately, though, who the fuck cares. Jesus Christ, libs are insufferable.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Oh, I thought people were calling bomb threats to Vance so it was a heckler’s veto.

I was so confused reading this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh, okay, I wasn’t following the fact that the bomb threats were also coming from his camp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Am I dumb that seems like the exact way to use that phrase

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Bluesky sucks so much ass. It’s just the tut tutting scolds from Twitter without weird twitter or any fascists to yell at.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

iirc you can’t even dunk on people because once they block you their followers can’t see your replies

permalink
report
parent
reply

Libs created a back to brunch site where republicans and leftists are quickly booted out.

permalink
report
parent
reply