35 points

The difference between a million and a billion?

About a billion.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

If you take a million dollars away from someone with a million dollars, they would be broke. If you took a million dollars away from a billionaire, they would basically still be a billionaire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But not part of the 3 commas club anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just put it all in mutual funds, and you’d earn $80 million a year in growth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

I just spent a few days visiting the French Riviera during my vacation.

Yeah we do overestimate underestimate the income of the top 1%. The amount of absurd wealth these people have is gross.

Edit: thank you stranger for the word

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I think you meant “underestimate.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. Yes I did.

Thank you for noticing

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Visited Seoul with my friend who’s family is deeply tied to Samsung.

What an eye opener.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I learned a perspective trick whenever I ridicule a price I see for something like quality clothes and such. For every additional digit in your income, remove a digit from the cost of something. Most of us are at 5 digits, and we prefer sales because 100 dollars for a pair of jeans is way too much while 10 dollars isn’t. To a 6 digit earner, the base price of affordable.

Now think of someone who earns 7 digits as year, to them a 1000 dollar piece of clothing is reasonable. To the 8 digit, a 10000 dollar piece of clothing is reasonable. If you make a billion dollars a year? A pair of jeans worth 1 million dollars is reasonable.

It’s just a thought experiment but it helps me better understand why gacha whales exist, why people buy million dollar cars, etc… It’s also just so far removed from the rest of society that it’d be laughable if it wasn’t so sad.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I guess it depends on how they quantify it.

Are they talking about a $ value cutoff or a % of wealth cut off?

Top 1% of $ varies by state:

https://www.fox29.com/news/salary-needed-top-1-percent-all-50-us-states

So, for here, it’s $707,296.

Lowest is West Virginia at $435,302.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Or to quantify it further. If someone has $20m, but no job. Is this person in the top 1%? I think so, but it is conceivable that this person lives very frugally in order to pass that on to his children or something.

Also, I think people like to say the top 1%, when they really mean the top 0.1%. I believe the top 1% income or savings, however it is defined, is a lot lower than most think. I believe when most people refer to this colloquially, they really mean billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you have $20m you are EASILY making 500k/year in interest/dividends/investment growth. You’d have to try pretty hard to not grow your $20m.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The point was, how is top 1% determined? Some people have high income and spend it all, others are good savers but don’t have a high income. Or is it based on net worth? I realize this may sound ridiculous, but as I mentioned, I believe 1% is a lower bar than people think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Phys.org

!phys@rss.ponder.cat

Create post

Phys.org internet news portal provides the latest news on science including: Physics, Nanotechnology, Life Sciences, Space Science, Earth Science, Environment, Health and Medicine.

Community stats

  • 610

    Monthly active users

  • 3K

    Posts

  • 278

    Comments