12 points

The Hollywood bankruptcy auctions in a few years are gonna be lit

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

seeing overpaid movie stars get replaced by ai will be fun.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Most them have protections in place preventing use of their likeness. Directors and other high level professionals will probably have enough money to sue anything that comes out of Runway. It’s the artists, vfx, wardrobe, etc (i.e. low level people) that are going to get fucked. None of the savings will be passed to consumers and we will get derivative or rehashed works as a result. Only hope is that the money propping these AI replacements dries up because the studios can’t attract movie goers with the even more unoriginal shit they will try to push.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah this isn’t the plan.

The plan is to get the stars in for a couple of days in front of a green screen, have them say their lines, then use “AI” to generate the rest of the scene. You want to get rid of all the labor around scouting sets, getting permits, constructing them, lighting them, feeding the crew etc. That’s where a big part of the cost of making a movie lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Lionsgate hopes to save “millions and millions” replacing all those tawdry storyboard artists and visual effects crew with “cutting-edge, capital-efficient content creation opportunities,” said vice chairman Michael Burns.

that sounds entirely unfit for human consumption. I can’t wait for Saw XV: Capital-Efficient Content Creation Opportunity! pump that melty-faced banal nonsense straight into my consumer veins!

permalink
report
reply
112 points

permalink
report
reply
42 points

This is a process known as proletarianization. It happened to the artisans when we moved to industrial manufacture, it happened to the pastoralists when we moved to factory farming, and now they can finally go after artists and techs and editors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Shut up with your history man I don’t want to learn and want to repeat until the earth boils, what’s so wrong with that?

No but really, if these tools were actually to be used in such an egregious manor of which their creators envision, their little short term stock bump means actual energy and water scarcity for a lot of us. Yay. Could be any other proletarianization, but we get the one that could really fuck us over

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am wondering if that would work for books. Most books are marketed as: best selling author brandon sanderson etc. So if a book doesn’t have an author on the cover, it would be hard to sell imo. For example, when I am looking for a book to read, I always check out the author and their other works.

Maybe it will be something like this: AI writer based on best selling author brandon sardersons.

But that is probably even worse than having no author on the cover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fortunately, that is sure to fail. Unless we find a way to make ai have a desire to spend. No money to spend? No products to sell. Entire system goes out of balance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yes, but will humans realize that before everyone has starved and the knowledge of how to do those things is gone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Ah yes, the enshittening continues

permalink
report
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 462

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators