28 points

The need for UBI continues to grow at an alarming rate.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Will never happen. Those at the top would sooner fund extermination squads to round up the poor than send a single cent in aid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

In a way they already are, with the rich people funding the far right extremist ecosystem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

best we can do is 100 free chatgpt queries per month. If you can’t make a living from that you need to catch up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

seeing overpaid movie stars get replaced by ai will be fun.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Most them have protections in place preventing use of their likeness. Directors and other high level professionals will probably have enough money to sue anything that comes out of Runway. It’s the artists, vfx, wardrobe, etc (i.e. low level people) that are going to get fucked. None of the savings will be passed to consumers and we will get derivative or rehashed works as a result. Only hope is that the money propping these AI replacements dries up because the studios can’t attract movie goers with the even more unoriginal shit they will try to push.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah this isn’t the plan.

The plan is to get the stars in for a couple of days in front of a green screen, have them say their lines, then use “AI” to generate the rest of the scene. You want to get rid of all the labor around scouting sets, getting permits, constructing them, lighting them, feeding the crew etc. That’s where a big part of the cost of making a movie lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Everyone boo this studio

permalink
report
reply
114 points

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Fortunately, that is sure to fail. Unless we find a way to make ai have a desire to spend. No money to spend? No products to sell. Entire system goes out of balance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yes, but will humans realize that before everyone has starved and the knowledge of how to do those things is gone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

This is a process known as proletarianization. It happened to the artisans when we moved to industrial manufacture, it happened to the pastoralists when we moved to factory farming, and now they can finally go after artists and techs and editors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am wondering if that would work for books. Most books are marketed as: best selling author brandon sanderson etc. So if a book doesn’t have an author on the cover, it would be hard to sell imo. For example, when I am looking for a book to read, I always check out the author and their other works.

Maybe it will be something like this: AI writer based on best selling author brandon sardersons.

But that is probably even worse than having no author on the cover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Its the same for films, without Robbie and Gosling would Barbie have done half as well with no name actors or even worse AI generated actors? I am sure Gerwig brought positive attention to the film from her name as well. Name value is important and as Kevin Hart and the Rock are finding out if you don’t spend maintaining it properly its quite easy to lose all that positive association.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We already have ghostwriters. Should be straightforward to conjure up an AI generated face who will look nicer than regular human authors and never say anything awkward, then have a textual genai system where you feed a few cheap ghostwritten works into one end and it regurgitates a franchise of arbitrary length, mimicking the style of someone who will have difficulty challenging the publisher in court. Bring in a new human ghostwriter every now and then to freshen up the training data if needs be. You might need to still employ some editors, but rebrand them as “prompt refiners” and give them shittier contracts.

Honestly, stuff like the MCU could be run like this already for all I know, and if it isn’t, I wonder how long it would take for someone to notice if they switched to this model?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Shut up with your history man I don’t want to learn and want to repeat until the earth boils, what’s so wrong with that?

No but really, if these tools were actually to be used in such an egregious manor of which their creators envision, their little short term stock bump means actual energy and water scarcity for a lot of us. Yay. Could be any other proletarianization, but we get the one that could really fuck us over

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Lionsgate hopes to save “millions and millions” replacing all those tawdry storyboard artists and visual effects crew with “cutting-edge, capital-efficient content creation opportunities,” said vice chairman Michael Burns.

that sounds entirely unfit for human consumption. I can’t wait for Saw XV: Capital-Efficient Content Creation Opportunity! pump that melty-faced banal nonsense straight into my consumer veins!

permalink
report
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 462

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators