I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for a few months now and to be honest I’m kind of disappointed. I really appreciate the privacy concerns and the lack of tracking software. It got really annoying how Google would “recommend” things that it thought I was interested in when I wasn’t interested in them, that kind of thing. But on the other hand, I’ve been starting to get really frustrated at just how hard it is to search for anything. You have to be really specific, especially if it’s something niche or if you don’t fully know the right terms to ask for. At least with Google, if you weren’t completely correct about a topic, it could at least parse what hobby or activity you were trying to ask about and bring up things related to that. But with DDG, I’ve found it doesn’t even really try in that regard. Plus it’s frankly really dumb how it uses Apple Maps as opposed to, I dunno? OSM? I honestly prefer Google Maps despite my dislike of the search engine so the usage of Apple Maps is really offputting.

Now, before you say anything, going in I knew it wouldn’t be as easy to search for things as on Google, but I’m pretty experienced with the internet and I didn’t think it would be a problem. But even being hyper-specific yields surprisingly little results if it’s something niche. Even wording it like you would on a University library search engine doesn’t seem to work as good as I might expect.

I’m open to considering more mainstream options too like Bing if it’s better than I remember it being.

edit: I should’ve mentioned, I’m not necessarily saying I want to make a full switch just yet to any daily driver situation, I’d just like some recommendations for when DDG is being DDG and not giving me any relevant results.

30 points

I know what you mean. I still use it all the same as my default search, the reason is the bang (!) Operators.

So if the ddg normal search isn’t working, I can add a !g and I get the Google version. Or if I want Google maps… Then I just add !gm

The other one I use a lot is wolfram alpha for unit conversions and calculations, just add a !wa

Hacker news search is !HN

Having this one stop shop for many different search types end up being way better than Google, even if somethimes the regular search may not be so great

permalink
report
reply
11 points

+1 for ddg’s bang operators. I use !w for Wikipedia, !gsc for Google scholar, !py for Python docs, !pypi, !imdb, and !tvdb frequently. Here’s a searchable list: https://duckduckgo.com/bangs

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ok TIL, never knew they were a thing!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Kagi also has bangs. My muscle memory carried over from ddg so I often forget if I’m using Kagi on my personal device or ddg on my work laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s the advantage of those over just adding those keywords to the browser’s search bar? I can type “gm anything” in all of my browser, and it will just open Google Maps directly. I don’t understand why people keep calling this a great feature of ddg when you can achieve the same without the detour through ddg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For me, personally, the advantage is I don’t have to set up all the custom searches myself, there are a lot of them, and you can guess most!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I switched to SearXNG and never looked back since. It’s a meta search engine that encompasses multiple other engines like google, bing, ddg, wikipedia, openstreetmaps and many more. You can always select which engines you want to use and the best is that this tool makes your search anonymous. you have to select a server at searx.space and then you right click the url to make it the default search engine on firefox.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Right now I am testing Kagi, which is a paid alternative - from a privacy point of view, it looks great, and the results are good. It also has a lot of additional features that suit me well. No Maps integration though. alternatively, I can recommend SearXNG, but it involves a bit of tinkering.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Seconded on Kagi. I’ve been using it for a few months now. Good results and I think it makes sense to pay for search. As the old saying goes “if it’s free online, you are the product”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Kagi is well worth the price imo. I never really have to fall back to a different search engine; it’s way better than DDG. It also has lenses that you can customize to really narrow down results to exactly what you need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve been using Kagi for about a month, and I have to say the searches are excellent! No more wasting time searching through over-SEO’d ad-ridden crap! Just high quality results!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Never heard of it before. First thing that came to mind, is, if it’s privacy focused, it’s odd to have to create an account, and give their your credit card, if you are ‘privacy focused’, it sounds like the opposite you’d want.

But they do address those on their site, which is neat. I dunno if I’m ready to switch from Google, tho, worst case, sometimes I ask Bing instead when google’s results are of… questionable quality. I wonder how kagi would fare on those…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I get what you mean, though on the other hand, a company that bills itself as privacy focused and is funded by user payments is (most likely) serving the users with search as the product, and not harvesting minute data from the users in order to serve advertizers with users as the product. Maybe they have your name and credit card, but don’t track and retain anything else? I wouldn’t assume that and would read through their actual terms - I think this could go either way - but I wouldn’t write the whole thing off automatically either.

Edit: could be it’s not unlike paying a VPN/privacy focused email provider like Proton, which supposedly has your payment info (for premium/pro) but not the content of your emails, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Doesn’t ddg pull results from Bing? I don’t think that would solve your problem.

I will recommend the obvious choices if you haven’t considered them already.

  • StartPage - pulls from Google
  • Brave - Independent and yields really good results, however relies on Bing/Google for images
permalink
report
reply
2 points

agreed I’ve had really good luck with brave for searches and it allows !bangs too

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It pulls some of its results from bing. It’s mostly better than google (except for images) so I’m using it for now

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve been impressed by how well brave search is on the brave browser

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I thought I was going to hate Brave search, but I didn’t. The summary bit at the top of the search results is super cool, too!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 81K

    Comments