0 points

Maybe some of the women were also not trackable anymore because they changed their surname, in contrast to them not publishing anymore. Didn’t read all of it, did they account for that?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I think (I am not that deep into science publishing) every author gets an ID under which they publish. Even with a name change this ID stays the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Shocked face… No surprise to anyone who has actually worked in that environment.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Absolutely. It’s a shit show.

And interestingly, making the general public more aware of this is likely quite important. Because 1, they have very idealistic views of what research is like, and 2, just about everyone is entering research blind to the realities. It’s a situation that needs some sunlight and rethinking.

IMO, a root cause is that the heroic genius researcher ideal at the base of the system’s design basically doesn’t really exist any more. Things are just too big and complex now for a single person to be that important. Dismantle that ideal and redesign from scratch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I kind of suspect things were always too big and complex for one person to address but the rampant individualism of our society obscures that history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Possibly, but when scientific knowledge and problems were smaller, one person could actually make a mark alone IMO. And if they happened upon a new discovery or insight then they’d appear to be geniuses, all alone.

At some point, when the work to make a discovery requires more than one person and the amount of theory involved in understanding its significance is too much for one person to be authoritative on all of it, then it’s a team sport.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Oh look, an article about me.

Got a PhD, hated it. Started working academia, hated it. Tried a corporate lab, hated it even more. Realized I was extremely burned out on the whole world of research and got into something far more tangible.

Very happily doing hazardous materials safety and handling now.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Based on what I hear from my colleagues’ experiences, most of them still want to continue doing research, but there aren’t enough research jobs and funding available for all of them.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yep. There’s a whole world of people happy to work very hard on research for the rest of their lives … and instead we have them writing emails wrangling spreadsheets for … ??

Sometimes “shitty” work needs to be done, obviously … but I think it’s far less obvious that the pool of things that need to be done lies entirely in the random inefficient shit the business world just accepts. Instead, that’s just where the money flows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In life, we can all be artists or scientists, as long as you have:

Wealthy parents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Other 40% must quit in the eleventh year.

permalink
report
reply

Science

!science@lemmy.ml

Create post

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


Community stats

  • 561

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 3.3K

    Comments

Community moderators