2 points
*

Oh shit! I’m almost in this picture and I’m so here for it lol!

(I was both above and below in the replies in that thread lol, that loser was talking to me!)

permalink
report
reply
6 points

As grim as that vision is, it’s at least more coherent than Marx’ “withering away of the state”, in which all the commissars and apparatchiks voluntarily dismantle their powers.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

The withering away of the state is one of the main disputes between Marxists and anarchists, I believe, but the Marxist conception of the dictatorship of the proletariat is not some Soviet-style oligarchy, but a democratic socialist society choosing to strip away the pieces of the coercive apparatus of the state until only voluntary communal associations are left. The Marxist-Leninist conception, on the other hand, is completely insane for the reasons you imply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The overly simplistic way to compare is anarchists think that the utopian society should be implemented bottom - up, then horizontally. While Marx thinks top - down, then horizontally

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What are you trying to say? That anarchism is the end state of communism? Because that’s definitely not the case, they’re two completely different philosophies. The fediverse is, for better or worse, kind of an anarchistic structure with its decentralized governance.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

What are you trying to say? That anarchism is the end state of communism? Because that’s definitely not the case, they’re two completely different philosophies.

They have two entirely different ideas of how to get there, but the goal of both, apparently unless you’re an ML, is pretty essentially the same. The dictatorship of the proletariat is a transitional phase, not an end-goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply

MeanwhileOnGrad

!meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

Create post

“Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he’s on the floor!”

Welcome to MoG!

Meanwhile On Grad

Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?

Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don’t be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You’ll be warned if you’re violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 324

    Posts

  • 6.9K

    Comments