93 points
*

The fact that trump filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania this morning means he’s worried about winning the state. The more lawsuits he files, and the sooner he claims victory (in a state or the whole thing), the worse his numbers actually are.

The polls are being manipulated to shit, and are not based on any reality.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I only heard about one lawsuit, is that the one he dropped? Source?

Not that I don’t believe you, I just like to know details.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
26 points

“New lawsuit just dropped.” I get it now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I live here and replied to this post you linked. The TL;DR of the comment there is:

I do feel the lawsuit is valid, but the delays he’s complaining are caused by Republican efforts to make early/mail-in voting harder during COVID when they didn’t want people to easily vote in a hurry. Now that they do, they’re mad they got what they wanted.

It’s just more of them trying to “prove the system doesn’t work,” and the main proof they have is the stuff they themselves broke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Who the hell is actually answers all the spam?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Olds

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Dums

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

if the “problem” is that women are voting–not just democrat women, but ALL women–then maybe the actual problem is your fucking stone age bullshit anti-woman platform, rather than “not enough males are voting”

fucking incel troglodytes

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I’ve been hearing qons complain (or “joking”, but in a ha-ha only serious way) about women having the vote since as long as I can remember. Sadly, not all incels - many of them married, and with their wives within earshot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points
*

Never interrupt your enemy when they are sowing and reaping their own destruction

I just mean this is something that could directly and very palpably affect the otherwise conservative-voting woman.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Conservative women gleefully vote against their own interests every time. If Trump’s platform included women losing the right to vote, conservative women would support it without question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I disagree. But the question would be, “does my husband get two votes?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Got to keep them Women in line. The American Taliban are alive and well and they have found a home in the MAGA terrorist organization.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Gotta keep them women in line.

women get in voting lines

No not like that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I prefer the term Yeehawdists 🤠

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Y’all Qaeda

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Can we make Bubba Bolsheviks a thing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Don’t forget Meal Team 6

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d like to see these guys run. A fifty yard dash, even.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I’d refer to the xtian Taliban a lot on certain forums and I’d get butthurt reactions (and people trying to get my comment deleted or me banned) from the magabrained - one claim was that xtianity and the Taliban/Islam are diametrically opposed (lol). The other was the usual whining over the shorthand of “xtian”.

What the xtianists don’t really seem to realize - or don’t want to acknowledge - is that they and the extremist Muslim are only separated by the most minor of doctrinal things that a lot of people simple don’t care about - whether Jesus is or is not the son of their god (the same god, by the way, since both are Abrahamic cults), or whether you eat bacon or not doesn’t really fucking matter if you plan on doing the same kinds of things to at-risk groups - trans, gays, women, etc - all in the name of the same god as the other group - again, which is the same exact god - Jehovah, Yahweh, Allah, all the same thing.

Also, the shorthand of “xtian” comes from the xtians themselves, lol.

The xtianists absolutely fucking hate it when this is pointed out to them. Again, all factual, they cannot refute it. That’s why they want it silenced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Vanilla ISIS

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

Look Magats,

I don’t get laid because women have the free will to choose their partners. You don’t get laid because you don’t like that they do.

We are not the same.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments