7 points

Before people start assigning blame, just pointing out that even if all independent votes magically counted for Kamala (ranked choice would be so cool…) it wouldn’t have changed the outcome at all

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I wish I could give you more upvotes. This is the reality of the situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Don’t worry, multiple RCV measures also failed because no matter how much people complain about the two-party system they’re also TOO FUCKING DUMB to understand how anything works or what to do about fixing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

They both work for the Kremlin. Makes sense.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

How did you acquire this information?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

She’s his colleague. Maybe even work wife, even if they’ve only spoken via teams telefax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Why wouldn’t she be? She is a tremendous help to his campaign.

permalink
report
reply
-38 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And Trump hasn’t endorsed it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

No one is endorsing genocide. It’s a bit too late in the game to keep going with that nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

No one is endorsing genocide

Both parties continue to defend the military operations in Gaza and Lebanon resulting in genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

He should vote for her.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I 100% support this 3rd party vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

WHERE ARE THE FUCKING TANKIES NOW!!!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

They love trump cuz putin loves trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Deactivated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Celebrating their victory, where else?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments