On election night, as the results looked to be in Trump’s favor, the baseless conspiracy theories about fraud began tapering off.

81 points
*

No, not true. They are saying that this time they knew to watch close, so the Democrats couldn’t pull of the same fraud as 2020. They are indeed stating that it is “supisious” that 13 Million Democratic voices where nowhere to be seen this time around, taking that as proof they were right all along.

That’s how this works. You take reality and then make it mean what you want it to mean. So that’s their take in regards to voter fraud.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

That’s how this works. You take reality and then make it mean what you want it to mean.

What’s “fun” is when you realize an awful lot of people do this with an awful lot of topics all the fucking time. Probably including yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I would say everyone does it. Confirmation bias isn’t something you can completely avoid. You can try to recognise it in yourself, but most of the time it’s a lot more subtle. As simple as reading something you agree with and not going to check the source. We ALL do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Absolutely. I try to counter it by beeing aware and checking M opinions against facts where possible. But I am sure there are many topics where I don’t fully succeed or I haven’t caught myself doing it yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s an extremely common aspect of human psychology to make up a story to explain the results of an event or reasoning for your actions after the fact.

It’s even been demonstrated in specific cases in studies of people who’ve received brain hemisphere bifurcation to prevent grand mal seizures.

The side of the brain responsible for speech is not shown information or things the individual must complete, then when asked why they performed such an action, the speech responsible side of the brain will spontaneously make up a resonable sounding story to explain it.

I highly recommend checking it out. It’s an absolutely fascinating look into human psychology

I’m sure I do this same thing all the time subconsiously, and I’ve certainly noticed it in others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sounds like free-wil denial pseudo-science

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You really have to be a stupid person to be a Republican these days. Wild.

permalink
report
parent
reply
199 points

Isn’t that weird?

It’s almost like they didn’t believe in their own claims.

permalink
report
reply
102 points

Or they don’t want anyone investigating their victory too closely

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

They already caught republicans doing shady shit before Tuesday. Who knows how many they didn’t catch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
142 points

No, the narrative just changed. Good luck convincing anyone the 2020 election wasn’t stolen ever again.

“I told you. In 2020 we won all 50 states. Voter fraud by the millions. I was saying it all along. But we worked hard, we passed laws for election integrity, we watched the polls and they couldn’t cram their 10, 15 million votes into the boxes again. And look what happened. Instead of winning by 8 million votes, she lost by 6 million votes. Which is what should have happened last time.”

This is the narrative I’ve been hearing. The voters that just stayed home simply never existed in the first place, as far as they’re concerned. He’s going to use this victory as proof of his claim that he should have won last time, voter fraud was rampant, and Democrats are cheaters. And it’s going to work.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

And it’s going to work.

Well, let’s face it - the target audience for such stupid narratives are his base, and they are dumb as a box of rocks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Please don’t insult them. Boxes of rocks can still serve a purpose and don’t deserve to be denigrated like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No box of rocks ever called me a ______. Insert a slur!

No box of rocks ever had his picture taken with Jeffrey Epstein!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Remember that half of the population is below average.

I’m assuming that other 2% had other motivations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s honestly now how averages work. Most of the population is roughly average.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Below average? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Should we tell him who was president in 2020 and who was president in 2024? Oh right, it doesn’t matter to them as long as they repeat it a million times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And used to support the claim to change voting in some way, or do away with it at least for Federal level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Schrödinger’s voter fraud

permalink
report
reply
39 points

My co-worker and I were talking about that last night. I told her that it’s amazing that not one fucking republican as uttered those two words, “voters fraud”, since Tuesday night. Isn’t it amazing how that is no longer a problem??? The fucking hypocrites!!!

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I told her that it’s amazing that not one fucking republican as uttered those two words, “voters fraud”, since Tuesday night.

Oh, I’ve heard them use those words, mostly in context of claiming that their watchful eyes prevented those evil Democrats from being able to do it this time. You know, because the party that can’t win without voter suppression and gerrymandering believes that they are the party that can’t lose without voter fraud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s always projection. ALWAYS.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments