ABCnews

6 points

Couple of points: I like Cornel West. I used to listen to him regularly on the Tavis Smiley Show, and while I disagree with his religion, I generally approve of his politics.

The amount he owes is concerning, because it makes him vulnerable to undue influence, in the same way that Trump was. I don’t really care that he owes back taxes, the child support is a problem IMO. People should take care of their kids, period. He’s got the money to do it.

That said, I don’t want him running as a Green; I want him running as a Democrat. Greens are largely fringe candidates, and the votes they win are votes that would likely otherwise go to Democratic candidates. Unfortunately, in our current system, that makes it probable that, unless there’s a similarly popular Libertarian candidate taking votes from the Republican candidate, that the Republican is more likely to win. I am not a fan of Democrats; I find that they are unwilling to go nearly far enough on most things, and I strongly oppose their stance on 2A rights. But I oppose Republican far, far more. Given that I have a practical choice between Dems and Republicans at a national level, I’ll vote Dem 95% of the time (I think I’ve voted Republican once or twice, but I honestly don’t remember who, or under what circumstances). If Greens can demonstrate, through local and state level wins, that they have the power to win national elections, then I’ll be happy to vote Green. And I do vote Green at a local level. But so far, they just aren’t winning locally or at state levels in sufficient numbers to indicate that they have a snowball’s chance in hell of winning a national election, much less a presidential election. West shoudl step aside once he’s made a strong showing and convinced Biden to adopt some of his platform.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

the votes they win are votes that would likely otherwise go to Democratic candidates

citation needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here’s a source for you. Note that People’s World is a socialist new organization.

From the article, “The GOP has a long history of using the Green Party as a tool to siphon votes that might go to Democrats and of playing a spoiler role in our two-party, winner-take-all electoral system. And the Green Party leadership has opportunistically embraced the support, playing the role of what some describe as ‘useful idiots.’ […] In 2016, Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein garnered 30,000 votes in Wisconsin; Trump won the state by 23,000 votes.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s an entirely other way of reading that data, which is to say that Hillary could have picked up 30,000 more votes in Wisconsin if she had been a better candidate and run a better campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

this does not prove that i would have voted for hilary clinton in 2016. because i wouldn’t have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

I’ve noticed an increase in “bOtH sIdEs!11!!!” bullshit on Lemmy lately, along with your usual cadre of dumbfucks who will be manipulated into tacitly supporting the republican traitor filth. And I’m betting it’ll steadily tick upward.

permalink
report
reply

You think Cornell West is a Republican?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Depends - are you measuring by weight or volume for his capacity of shit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I think Cornel West not paying his child support is one of very few things I dislike about Cornel West as a person.

One of the others, of course, being that he’s running as a spoiler candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What is a spoiler candidate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

No. He’s a useful idiot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

He’s a spolier candidate that is openly backed by interest groups on the right. He isn’t personally a Republican, or ideologically conservative, but he sure has some strange friendships.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Splitting the vote is liberal myth, we wouldn’t vote for your shitty candidates if they were the only ones running

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Spoiler candidate when not voting for one of thr two preferred oligarchs is kind of a degrading term. Perot didn’t spoil the Bush campaign- and the Libertarian party, that gets more votes than the Green, draws mostly from “would-be Republicans”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Amd that debt is going to magically disappear the day after the election. Just you watch.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

He’s just the latest version of Jill Stein that the right is rolling out to take votes away from the Dem ticket. Same ole story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

if they’re taking votes that they didn’t earn you should contact the fec

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well this time the Right has both the Greens and JFK Jr to take votes away. It’s infuriating that it is so obvious and yet people will still fall for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Honestly RFK Jr aint nearly as much of a spoiler as West, after all West isnt talking to Jordan “Steak and benzos” Peterson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Some Republican will gladly buy him off with that debt. The whole Green Party is a Republican front to steal votes

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

who do you think they steal votes from?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But in terms of 3rd parties that draw from a major party the libertarians draw more votes from Republicans than greens from dems

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It worked 6 years ago and there are clearly enough suckers out there that it could work again next year.

All they have to do is create enough apathy, mistrust and hate toward the DNC to convince a small slice of people into voting for them. Siphon off a few votes to the Greens. Siphon off a few more votes to JFK Jr. Siphon off a few more votes to those who will simply stay home on elections day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I was wondering when Democrats were going to get around to their smear campaigns against progressives. Looks like they’re starting early this campaign season

permalink
report
reply
4 points

You mean smearing the spoiler candidates the GOP put up to split the ticket juat about every election the past 20+ years? That’s who you’re worried about the left smearing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You mean smearing the spoiler candidates the GOP put up to split the ticket juat about every election the past 20+ years?

There are smear campaigns against RFK Jr?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The GOP? You don’t know much about politics in this country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Is the libertarian candidate a spoiler put up by democrats every year?

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

As bad as that debt is, it would be worse if it just up and mysteriously disappeared one day.

I hope folks are watching it like hawks.

I like Doctor West as a person, he’s a fascinating guy, and a great speaker, but nobody in that much debt should be anywhere near elected office.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the debt up and mysteriously disappeared it would mean persons unknown paid it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

but you think you know who it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I work in the finance/baking sector. I literally couldn’t get a job like this. Every bank or financial institutions HR departments would disqualify you on a background check.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

he’s not applying for your job

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Ya, but the entire reason I wouldn’t be able to get a job is they view you as too vulnurable to manipulation and bribery. Sounds like things you want to avoid in a president or any political office holder…

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 477K

    Comments