53 points

There has to be some (dis)incentive to have children without marriage in some contries and not others.

I Germany I guess people think you might as well marry when having children because you get extra money, less taxes whatever and maybe that’s not the case in other countries.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

The short answer is religion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Marriage is a civil institution in Germany. A church marrying you has exactly as much legal power as a random citizen doing it: None. You get married at the civil registry office, by a bureaucrat (but yes they’re amenable to some mild ceremony)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What about the whole Christian no-sex-before-marriage? Has to contribute at least something

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

and Taxes

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

religion and taxes… 2 of the same to get your money for the rich

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Another very important factor is that in Germany it’s extremely difficult to become the official father of a child when you’re not married to the mother. This obviously comes with a lot of problems. For example when the mother suffers complications during birth. It’s just way easier to marry instead of doing all of that paperwork.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t think it really matters in Finland

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, in Germany you get tax benefits under certain circumstances when married. In many other countries (e.g. Austria), marriage makes no difference. That’s already a strong motivator.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

In Germany there are massive tax advantages to getting married. That is why a lot of people get married in late December of each year.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

Shouldn’t that sort of discrimination be illegal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I don’t think you can call it discrimination if no one is excluded from marrying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That only makes sense if you assume that marriage is a purely financial thing. It has lots of other aspects that have nothing to do with money that a lot of people dislike.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It is a discrimination since not everyone will find somebody to marry. And even if everybody could marry, it still is a discrimination towards not married people.

Marring for the purpose to get tax benefit and oder advantages is a sign of discrimination, because they are marring to get advantages in society.

Society is full of discriminations that people have normalised and so they don’t see it as such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Can we get another map about inceptions out of mariage? Many marry only after learning they will be parents.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We’ll do deceptions out of marriage after!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Iceland, nice.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Rounding error when they truncated the last two significant figures. Actual value is 0.020% higher.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

In Germany the difference between former East and West Germany is very interesting. While in the East it is roughly 55% in the west it is much lower, also with clear differences from north to south: https://www.iwd.de/artikel/unehelich-na-und-291746/

permalink
report
reply
7 points

This is not what I would have expected given the general tendency seems to be “eastern block = less”. Curious about why this is reversed in Germany (and Bulgaria apparently).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

To be honest I dont get your comment. Can you maybe explain more? For me the distribution looks exactly like what I would have expected considering our history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I mean looking at the other numbers on the map, the eastern countries generally seem to have much lower outside-marriage birth rates yet east Germany has higher rates than the west. I’d have expected closer numbers to e.g. Poland in east Germany and closer to France/Belgium/Netherlands in the west.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Honestly, that still sounds very high. I’m in the prime birthing age and hardly anyone in my peer group is married, yet many have kids.

That’s anecdotal, sure, but it also implies that there’s a huge population of married child bearers. Where are those?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bavaria has entered the chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments

Community moderators