29 points

Good. They should receive everything they need.

permalink
report
reply
-50 points

Wars are just not fought that way, and to think that somehow ukraine has the ability to create a safe maintenance infrastructure in mid war is ridiculous. They can’t even do that with leopard tanks. They have to haul this stuff back to germany/poland for repair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

So you recomend not to help? Or what else could we do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Didn’t say that. I think it’s reasonable to assume that the military with the most experience in these weapons systems know what they’re doing. They don’t even have capable runways for F16s yet

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Fine by me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Hauling back to Poland or Germany is simply more convenient : Russia can’t bomb those countries, and they already have the people to fix the tanks there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not for now, it’s for later.

Ukraine has to start swirling over to NATO weapons platforms, so they have to start somewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Such great news and if the numbers are correct, a decent number of jets.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It’s a great start though from checking Wikipedia earlier it looks like Ukraine will still be heavily outnumbered so hopefully more keep coming. At a minimum it’s going to significantly contribute to leveling the playing field.

Air superiority would be fantastic and I hope it’s what they get in the medium term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

any estimates on when the crews and infrastructure will be combat ready?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Best not get too hung up on timetables, or think about it in terms of the current battlefield situation or the counteroffensive. This is a long term project to transform Ukraine’s Air Force into the future, where they’re using Western equipment.

We may see the first F-16s next year, but this transformation will take many years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah this is definitely a case where the best time would have been years ago but the second best time is right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A Danish military expert mentioned that an estimated timeline would look like 6-8 months depending on conditions. Weather in Denmark isn’t known to be favorable, especially during autumn and winter, which might add to the timeline with lost flying days and Ukrainian pilots might arrive with more know-how than estimated making it possible skip some flying lessons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It should take 3 to 6 months to form pilots and mechanics. Maybe 9.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It recently launched a long-anticipated counteroffensive against the Kremlin’s forces without air cover, placing its troops at the mercy of Russian aviation and artillery.

Zelenskyy welcomed the ‘’historic’’ announcement and praised Rutte for making the Netherlands the first country to offer the planes.

The announcement came minutes after the two leaders inspected two gray F-16 jets parked in a hangar at the Dutch base in the southern city of Eindhoven.

“It makes me proud that Denmark, together with the Netherlands, will donate F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine’s fight for freedom against Russia and its senseless aggression.

The Dutch and Danish governments are also involved in a coalition that is working to train Ukrainian pilots to fly the advanced fighter jets.

In a video message earlier Sunday, Zelenskyy vowed a stern retaliation for a Russian missile strike the previous day in the center of the northern Ukrainian city of Chernihiv that killed seven people and wounded over 100 others.


The original article contains 591 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

One thing I’ve missed in the discussion of sending F-16s is the role they’ll play.

From what I’ve seen, Russia still has significant air defense capabilities, and they launch air fired weapons from deep in their own territory. So, if the F-16s can’t get too far upfield, due to defenses, and there isn’t much they can do in air-to-air combat, what advantage do they have over longer range artillery?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

“Western fighters with stand-off weapons would offer Ukraine an improved capability to destroy fixed Russian targets near the frontlines from a safer distance,” he tweeted, but “they would be adding to existing strike options like Himars [rocket artillery] and drawing from limited stockpiles”.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/01/how-would-f-16-fighter-jets-aid-ukraine-against-russia

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks.That’s kinda what I thought, but assumed I was missing something with the amount of attention the transfer of this one weapon platform has received. I guess it’s also symbolic of the level of commitment by NATO, since it’s not just a few planes, but also ammo plus training plus support framework.

I’m glad we’re not just throwing ammo at the situation and wishing Ukraine the best of luck, though I do wish we were doing more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ukraine

!ukraine@sopuli.xyz

Create post

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine’s Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 8K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments