6 points

Personally I would prefer guillotines and pikes

permalink
report
reply
3 points

It’s time for guillotines

Trevor Moore

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZFxZmDNlV8

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks for sharing. I sure wish Trevor had stayed with us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I just started getting into watching “the Trevor Moore show” right before he passed. Felt like wkuk natural progression from wkuk for him and Sam. I was so sad when I heard the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The issue with revolutions is that while they tend to get rid of old elites, they create a new class of elites out of the top revolutionaries and the cycle just starts over again. Many communist revolutions were supposed to create these theoretically “equal” societies, but they just insert in a new ruling class.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The problem with vandguardism

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah but what are the other possibilities? Let them become kings?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Theoretically, by wiping out the rich would create instability within the wealthy class, they wouldn’t have the time or the means to herd the politicians to serve them or to effectively disrupt democracy.

The inheritance that kid collects would amounts to “Congratulation, you won the lottery, now what? You haven’t own any corporation yet, know of anything about how to make connections with other politicians and wealthy class of people and so forth. You’re pretty much on your own.”

Like 70% of the time, those people wouldn’t even bother with politic and would just spend the money vacationing where-ever in the world and having fun with the newfound wealth, not busy trying to disrupt democracy. People tend to be very shortsighted when they amasses huge wealth, in fact, according to some statistic, it ranges from 44% to 70% of people who gain huge amount of money end up losing it all within the next 5 years.

That amount of time would basically give the common people enough time to go about fixing the political system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Surely their huge stacks of money will protect them from the bullets, right? Right???

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’m worried you may be underestimating how many bootlickers would be willing to defend a billionaire in some sort of collapse scenario

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would personally prefer to sentence anyone with a net worth of over $1B to a lifetime eating $100 bills until they’ve literally eaten their fortune. Show them the real value of their monopoly paper, you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, yes, good luck getting to their closed communities and enwalled houses with panic rooms, personal bodyguards and police / law in their pockets. Did we even have any famous billionaire assassinations in history so far?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s why they’re all building bunkers. They know unrest is coming, they know they’re part of the problem, they just don’t care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The super-rich respond by raising the prices on pitchforks and torches. When asked, one replies “We must always maximize profits for us shareholders!”

permalink
report
reply
2 points

She said many rich people wanted to set up their own educational or health foundations without checking whether there was a need or an existing charity or government-funded programme working to address the issue.

When the rich only think about charity as a means to further their own name, it’s no wonder nothing ever really gets fixed.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!news@beehaw.org

Create post

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 993

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments