4 points

And almost none of them have hitches, so you can’t even tow with them. Such a waste.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Maybe you can make a pickup with an acetylene torch and a welder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

“SUVs” in a lot of cases are just raised hatchbacks on what are essentially regular ol’ car platforms; nobody’s going off-roading in a dang CR-V.

(that doesn’t do any favors for their fuel efficiency though)

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Thats a more recent trend, SUVs used to be more like suburbans and escalades, basically trucks with seats retrofitted into the bed area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

SUVs of their car counterparts drive like shit. Sure the Porche SUV drives nice, but the 911 drives wayyyy better. I’d take a wagon over an suv and just use snow tires when needed.

It’s been tested that an suv with regular tires and AWD can’t perform as well as a 2WD version with snow tires. With All seasons the snow performance is marginally better than snow tires.

https://youtu.be/atayHQYqA3g?si=7bnIVKH0EMno8Ahl

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Stationwagons are definitely underrated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think the word for that is a “crossover”. Is there actually a smaller version of the CRV frame?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

IIRC the accord is on the same frame as the CRV. At least thats what I heard about the current generation

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good nuts: Macadamia Pea Gorilla

Bad: Truck

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Not enough discretion in deciding what is an SUV in my humble opinion.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Maybe it’s like porn; you know it when you see it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The distinction is really not difficult. And I’ll tell you why: if a car manufacturer classifies a vehicle as an SUV, they can skirt around safety and pollution regulations.

That’s why they are everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s exactly it. They got marketed like crazy right before tougher emissions regulations came in around 2008 because they are classified as trucks and not cars. Anyone know if the truck emissions ever got restricted any after that time frame?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Far before that… check out the cars of the 60s and 70s. More stylish, but just as impractical, inefficient and deadly.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

SUVs are more deadly than cars in about every conceivable metric.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Mainly to people in other vehicles.

Check out cars from the 60s and 70s that didn’t even have seat belts, certainly not airbags, or body segments made to crumple and absorb impacts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right, I disagree with the premise of this meme that things were better before, they weren’t. But nowadays you do have options and we have better awareness so if you’re still making those dumb decisions like buying SUVs, that’s worse in a sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ah not far enough back for you, huh? More of a returntofish kinda person are you?

permalink
report
parent
reply

return to monke

!returntomonke@lemmy.basedcount.com

Create post

return to monke is a home for promotion, discussion, critique, and memeing of anarchoprimitivism and neoludditism.

Rule 0: post no illegal content.

Rule 1: keep the discussion civil.

Rule 2: don’t incite violence.

Click here to subscribe from your home instance: /c/returntomonke@lemmy.basedcount.com

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 38

    Posts

  • 155

    Comments

Community moderators