For me, I would choose computer viruses.

-14 points

Personalised marketing

permalink
report
reply
2 points

worst thing that has ever existed

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Advanced AI. It’s a job killer and the uses are truly dystopian. There is AI recently announced that can display someone’s thoughts on a monitor by reading their visual cortex. There are places in China where facial recognition checks if people are smiling before it allows them to proceed. Not to mention military uses straight out of a movie. There is no limit to the suffering it will bring.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’d say AI is in a sort of weird teenage years of being not good enough to truly add value to human experiences but powerful enough to cause significant amounts of harm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

oh god, i love the current advancements but these seem truly psychotic. I hope that we will be the reality where the ai advancements create a positive impact into our society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Plastic

permalink
report
reply
6 points

If I could go back in time I would keep plastic, but make it seem scary/dangerous due to how it never breaks down in the environment, and in turn hopefully cause regulation over how plastic should be produced, recycled, and disposed of before it became such a massive ubiquitous problem (micro plastics, pacific gyre, pollution, etc).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Seems like how slow-ass and inept the implementation of regulation has being going to be the main problem with all these techs. Bad intention people will always try to spun off the advancement in a money-grubbing, harmful way. Nothing is ever spared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That would be problematic, because the problem is not plastic itself, but its use. Plastic has allowed countless medical and scientific benefits, such as ureteral stents, stents for aneurysms, catheters… And these are just the examples that came to mind on the fly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

damn. it has ruined many things for sure, especially our sea

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Data mining / big data / ads

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Utopia time: we take away ads, now how is content funded? Subscriptions?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And small businesses die because they aren’t able to get the word that they exist out without advertising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

organic, word of mouth, grassroots, community building

My friends and I share cool places we find with each other all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. Ads don’t pay that much anyway, Reddit makes something like $10 per user per year. That means that even with a $1 subscription per user they’d be ahead. It’s the same for Youtube celebrities, they make their money from merchandise, Patreon and sponsorship deals, Youtube pays only a few dollars per thousand views even in ideal circumstances, even if a video has millions of views, you might only make a few thousand off it, and how many million view videos can a person realistically make?

We could probably replace the entire ad industry with something like $10 monthly divided among whichever sites we want to support.

Also, I get the argument that some people can’t afford $10 because of where they are, but then the ads being served to those people aren’t bringing any money in either, so you can adjust the cost downward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think it depends on the context though. Data mining of environmental sensors might yield valuable insights. Mining anonymized medical data could improve chances of catching a disease early, etc.

Agree on ads though. Nothing like having pharmaceutical ads stuffed down my throat while trying to watch a speedrun or whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Concrete. It is impossible to have any sort of modern civilization without concrete but you can still have education, division of labor, and a few of the things we enjoy in the modern world without ever becoming modern.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

What’s wrong with concrete though? I’ve never really looked into it before, am I missing something important?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not sure if this is what the parent had in mind, but concrete is absolutely disastrous from an environmental impact perspective. Not only in the manufacturing process, which is quite bad, but the end result, too. Massive water system disruptions lead to deadly floods and erosion, which lead to further problems. Building massive water dams are among the most disruptive thing humans can do to a functional ecosystem.

There’s also the societal impact from car-centric city design and all of the negative effects associated with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

return to donke

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Concrete is ancient though. The Roman empire had concrete

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!tech@kbin.social

Create post

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let’s explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

Community stats

  • 7

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 8.5K

    Comments

Community moderators