Avatar

52fighters

52fighters@kbin.social
Joined
74 posts • 134 comments
  • Latin Mass Catholic.
  • Father of 11 Children.
  • Business Owner.

Interests: Linux, Economics, Politics, & Religion.

You can find me on Mastodon: https://rcsocial.net/@52fighters

Direct message

They should ban those for anything that’s not restorative.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The Alliance Defending Freedom video tapes a sermon by a preacher specifically violating the rule and send it to the IRS, trying to bait them into applying the rule because they are confident SCOTUS will declare the rule unconstitutional. The IRS never takes the bait. They’d rather have the appearance of a rule than no rule at all. As it is it is mostly self-enforcing on most congregations.

permalink
report
parent
reply

All i would say is they should have provided 2fa if they didn’t.

At this point, every company not using 2FA is at fault for data hacks. Most people using the internet have logins to 100’s of sites. Knowing where to do to change all your passwords is nearly impossible for a seasoned internet user.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Is there anything we can do to avoid that protein? Diet or exercise?

permalink
report
parent
reply

I am able to subscribe and see new posts since my subscription. That wouldn’t happen if they were de-federated, would it?

permalink
report
parent
reply

There would be no penalty in this case. The law prohibits enforcement against the mother and activities that take place outside of the state are also not enforceable by Texas. The exception is if someone drives her to the state line for the purpose of obtaining an abortion or gives her money while both are situated in the State of Texas, although interesting would be a case where one is in Texas and the other isn’t, bringing up the interstate commerce clause.

Texas allows medical exceptions. I have not yet read why this case did not qualify for the exception. Presumably because the court did not agree the mother’s life was at serious risk? Has anyone a good read of the court’s ruling?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Virtually no laws are enforceable unless there’s a defining moment whereby someone becomes a person. Likewise, all laws regulating processing the dead and donation of organs are thrown into limbo without legal definitions of when a person is dead.

permalink
report
reply

You get dollars the same way anyone else would in the situation: You carry a trade surplus vs. the United States and then allow tax payments to be made in dollars. Prices settle as a function of dollars available, rate of circulation, and volume of goods & services available.

The policy should produce a boost in exports & employment but also produce a shortage of goods normally imported. It’ll also be a great time for Americans to visit, the dollar suddenly having a lot more purchasing power in Argentina.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Y’all, this is a rhetorical question meant to serve as a zinger against Israel. OP doesn’t want actual answers.

permalink
report
reply