Vice President Kamala Harris’ allies are particularly annoyed by the California governor’s move into the spotlight ahead of a possible 2028 Democratic nomination fight.

6 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Some Biden advisers have complained privately that the planned debate, which Fox News host Sean Hannity would moderate, could make voters think Newsom is running a shadow 2024 campaign at a time when most Democrats say they’d prefer a different candidate at the top of the ticket.

They also argue that it could elevate DeSantis, whom White House advisers initially perceived as a greater threat to Biden’s re-election hopes than the GOP front-runner, former President Donald Trump.

Newsom is expected to be a top surrogate for Biden’s campaign at the second Republican presidential primary debate in Simi Valley, California, in September, said a Democratic aide familiar with the plans.

Just as some Biden advisers are irked by Newsom’s move, others see potential benefit in a high-profile Democrat’s defending his record and agenda against a prominent Republican hopeful.

DeSantis exchanged barbs with Harris this summer as she harshly criticized a state education mandate to teach Florida schoolchildren about the “benefits” of slavery.

While the two governors tussle over the rules and timing of a debate — it could happen this fall, possibly in November — DeSantis is trying to gain traction in his uphill fight to beat Trump for the 2024 GOP nomination.


The original article contains 908 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
89 points

Gavin Newsom shouldnt be putting DeSantis on a stage.

Don’t platform these people.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Or do, and make him look foolish. I don’t know much about Newsom, but Desantis is a terrible public speaker.

(Not that it stopped 45, I guess…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Newsom is smart and quick. He would wipe the floor with him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’d disagree about 45. Maybe he was an idiot, but he could say stupid shit and fluster his debate opponents. Maybe the 2016 primary opponents were a low bar, but still…

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Newsom’s ex married Don Jr

don’t forget how close these schmucks actually are

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They feed on each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I think it’s just that Newsom know he can trounce DeSantis and make a fool of him on national TV, in the republican media backyard of FoxNews. I have no doubt he plans on running president, but I don’t think he’d be dumb enough to do it in 2024. I don’t imagine he’s well liked enough around the rest of the country.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

DeSantis just being DeSantis on TV is enough to make a fool out of himself, he really doesn’t need any outside help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I think it’s just that Newsom know he can trounce DeSantis and make a fool of him on national TV…

But thats just not how modern debates work. Each side comes away announcing they’ve won and ‘owned’ the other one. This gets repeated in the respective echo chambers.

I think D’s should be debating one another right now. We need a national dialogue on where the left and the progressive project of the previous 8 years is going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

We don’t need to give these fascist fucks like Desantis a platform. Their opinions aren’t valid at this point.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

No, we need to properly destroy the foundation they stand on. Why do these supposed freedom-loving individuals fall for the rhetoric of fascists? Why is it that it only took a couple generations to forget how badly fascism affected our world?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Newsom is desperate to run for president

permalink
report
reply
11 points

He’s an excellent Governor, and an excellent Democrat

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Certainly better than ex-cop Kamala

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I’d say eager, and why ‘desperate’?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 482K

    Comments