Barnes and noble wanted one of these domains and sent an appeal to ICANN. They lost the appeal.
Amazon operates these domains within a category of new domain names deemed “closed generics”, which are domain names that companies have successfully bid on or outright paid to get provisioned and own them for their own use and no one else’s. There has been persistent concern raised that this might create unfair monopolies especially for online shopping.
Amazon is the largest holder of closed generic domains on the internet. Nearly all of their domains they own are not able to be purchased and are for Amazon use only. There has been no consequences for this action and it seems unlikely there ever will for the foreseeable future as well.
@gabe@literature.cafe what if DNS providers disagreed?
Unsure, it would be very interesting to see if they decided to though. There was major concern raised from Barnes and Noble before Amazon swiped the domains from them.
@gabe@literature.cafe does amazon have any actual legal “ownership” over these TLDs? would there be repercussions for a DNS provider not acknowledging their “ownership”?
How is this not domain squatting?
No one should able to hoarde domains. That’s fucked.