The article is AdGuard centric but it sheds light on the whole process where Google suddenly decided to ban ad blockers.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
At the time, there were a number of apps on Google Play that offered content filtering functionality, such as AdAway, AdFree, Ad Blocker, and AdBlock Plus.
In 2016, Google tweaked its developer policy to clarify what actions are prohibited, and for the first time directly named ad blockers as a target.
After AdGuard for Android, which filters traffic for all apps on your device, could no longer be distributed through the Google Play Store, we had to find another way to reach our users and provide them with updates.
The increased visibility this store provides would allow us to introduce the app to more people who can block ad-based tracking, thereby protecting their privacy.
The reality is that most casual users install apps exclusively from the Google Play Store, and that means they are currently missing out on a chance to protect themselves from trackers and ads.
We hope that Google will change its stance and give people the choice and tools to protect themselves from pervasive tracking technology and invasive advertising.
The original article contains 1,019 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
We hope that Google will change its stance and give people the choice and tools to protect themselves from pervasive tracking technology and invasive advertising.
“Unlikely” would be an understatement in terms of Google ever being accepting of adblockers. That web attestation/DRM stuff is really telling
I mean to be fair, Google is considered an ad company, they aren’t going to promote things that would make them potentially lose money to themselves
It was bound to happen .
This is very old news. But I guess it’s never too late to make a copy article for advertising…
Because Google is an ad company. /article
save reason why Target doesn’t sell Amazon cards
