40 points

Good lord that is a horrendous website on mobile.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

for the first 2 seconds: that’s no bad… then all the pop ups came on

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Thank you Firefox and pi-hole… (I’m like "what popups? What ads?)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Firefox+ublock seemed to take care of it for me. I had to refresh the page before I could scroll though

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Had just 4 X-Buttons… could be worse. 🥸

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

One of those X’s was actually a Twitter logo. Fucking thing gets me all the time…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah, it’s pretty fucking awful, even with ublock origin on Android. Found a better source:

https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/lpo-announces-conditional-commitment-eos-energy-enterprises-produce-next-generation

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you disable javascript in ublock it is actually readable

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

LOL I have Ublock Origin so I don’t see the pop-ups but the website just freezes after 3 seconds of scrolling, and I have to leave. They’ve really ruined their site. 😆

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I have custom DNS filtering on my iPhone and the website looks perfectly fine. No ads or anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That doesn’t mean the website isn’t garbage. It’s good to call out trash sites like this so that people will stop going there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I just have Wipr (which is not a particularly good adblocker, it fails utterly at handling anti-adblocker sites), and it looks just fine on my phone too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Meh it worked just fine for me in Firefox Android with UBlock Origin and NoScript.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

“Think again, Jimmy. You see the firing pin in your gun was made out of, yep, zinc.”

permalink
report
reply
5 points

“Come back, zinc! Come back!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I wonder if it can be cheaper and better at scale than iron-air batteries. Those seem inexpensive to make, and can carry a large enough capacity if you put a whole lot of them in parallel with each other, and have a long lifetime. They’re just really heavy for their amount of energy density and fairly low current per cell, but that shouldn’t be a problem when building enough to be grid-scale.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

At that point one can use Na/O2… Much higher energy released by redox reaction, much lighter

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Looks promising, but not soon, I think.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Eli5? Don’t zinc batteries suck compared to lithium?

permalink
report
reply
33 points

It depends on what you value. For performance and power density, nothing really beats lithium at the moment.

However, for grid-scale battery these parameters are not necessarily very important. What matters most is cost over the lifetime, and that’s wher zinc batteries could be useful. They have the potential to be much cheaper than the cheapest lithium batteries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

They do. They are just looking for cheap way to store energy. They don’t care if batteries are big, heavy and less efficient, they need something as cheap as possible for a range of use cases where cost is important.

Lithium is expensive. My bet is that, on the long term, sodium will be used for such use cases. But in practice decision must account for practical limitations, primarily supply chain

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 538K

    Comments