How do you feel about GM and Ford moving the NACS charging standard, is it going to have a ripple effect?

3 points

Isn’t the Tesla version missing key features that other port styles have?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Nothing too critical to North America. NACS doesn’t support 3 phase (but neither does J-1772).

Tesla superchargers are currently limited to 400V, but that isn’t a limit of NACS or the handles themselves, more a reflection of Tesla not needing more than 400V so far. V4 superchargers are supposed to be able to do 1000V and the NACS spec is for 500 or 1000V.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As the owner of a CCS-ported car, I’m ok with this.

One standard, down from three options, seems right. Imagine having to worry about which shape of the filler nozzle at a gas station…

It will be nice to be able to use the rows and rows of vacant superchargers here in Atlantic Canada. The CCS chargers are too-often a gamble (or non-existent).

permalink
report
reply
2 points

With GM now on board I’m pretty sure this will cause a ripple effect and more automakers will join. Some sooner than others. The supercharger network has proven to be reliable for Teslas. I think it’s a good thing all around. However, we won’t truly know how well Ford and GM vehicles will integrate with superchargers until owners pull up and plug in. I have my fingers crossed that Volvo/Polestar is next!

permalink
report
reply

Electric Cars

!electriccars@lemmy.ca

Create post

Discussion of EVs and the technology around them

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 11

    Posts

  • 122

    Comments

Community moderators