The Congressional Integrity Project reports on several inconsistencies and untruths in James Comer’s House investigation

4 points

It’s all theatre for their retarded base who will never consume any media that criticises their bullshit. As far as the base is concerned it’s all a full-fledged impeachment process with mountains of evidence and practically in the bag.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Those are rookie numbers, how many years did they waste on repealing the ACA and “investigating” Benghazi?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

BUTTERY MALES

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Here’s the funny thing about Republicans repealing the ACA.

The Republicans controlled the house and Senate during Obama’s last two years in office. They passed bills fully repealing Obamacare to Obama who, of course, vetoed it.

This happened something like 80 some odd times. All so that they can stomp their feet and say that they were doing their part.

Then Commander Cheeto takes office and, again, with a Republican controlled Congress.

Guess how many bills were sent to repeat Obamacare.

Nada.

Goose eggs.

They all knew how much their constituents loved the benefits of Obamacare but lacked the actual balls to repeal it when they had the chance.

All the Republicans knew that the orange turd would have signed the bill because Trump was just that fucking stupid he couldn’t see the long game. So they never sent him a bill to repeal.

It was all posturing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because the ACA WAS their plan. When the Democrats passed the bill, the republicans were snickering to each other. “Oh no, don’t throw me into the briar patch!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I still remember how these assholes had beers in the Rose Garden to celebrate…{checks notes}…taking away healthcare from MILLIONS of Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Didn’t they spend most of the 90s “investigating” the Clintons? To only end up with a stain on a dress?

Yeah, these guys are pikers in Republican fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I still want someone to point out to Trump that Hillary Clinton testified for 11 hours and insinuate that this proves that she’s tougher. I was hoping for an 11 hour Trump testimony to the 1/6 Commission, but I’ll settle for 11 hours of Trump testimony at his various trials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

But when Comer and Grassley obtained the document, form FD-1023, and publicly released a redacted version – against the advice of intelligence officials who feared it would “unnecessarily risks the safety of a confidential source” – it turned out to be an uncorroborated FBI tip.

These ass-hats are putting people’s lives and national security at risk over this nonsense. The next potential tipster is going to keep their mouth shut now because of this idiocy.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Remember when Matt Gaetz stormed a SCIF? His justification was that they were holding “secret impeachment hearings”?

I led over 30 of my colleagues into the SCIF where Adam Schiff is holding secret impeachment depositions.

And the reality was that it was a briefing on how we had agents from the CIA inside low level positions of the Ukrainian government working with the Government that were watching Russian moles that also had positions in the Ukrainian government? And that Russia had found out that it was happening but hadn’t figured out who it was so they were launching all kinds of operations to try and get some information on who to kill? And this whole meeting was to figure out how best to help those agents before they got killed?

Fun times.

And what’s even better, you haven’t heard peep from Gaetz about his “brave” storming the SCIF since. Because he almost got a bunch of people fucking killed with his stunt, was told he almost got a bunch of people fucking killed, and all that “brave” shit disappeared like a fart in a hurricane. So…

These ass-hats are putting people’s lives and national security at risk over this nonsense

It’s not just this nonsense they’re doing it over. They do it over all kinds of bullshit. And people like Gaetz do not vet shit and eat it up like it’s the gospel. And nations like China, Russia, India, and what not know these fuckers will eat it up and feed it to them. They constantly bitch about “government conditioning” and other pyops bullshit, but they themselves are the major victims of it.

It’s got to be a fucking uphill battle when you have a political party that’s just eating foreign bullshit and calling domestic intelligence “weaponizing government”. Our intelligence apparatus does not want these fuck wits handing our country over to someone else, but goddamn it, they keep having so little trust in the USA because, IDK, but all I can chalk it up to is that they are absolutely fucking morons. They just want “someone” to be wrong so they can stroke their massive ego dicks is the best I can figure out.

What’s that mnemonic device for counterintelligence? MICE. There are four general things that will convince someone to betray their nation, “Money, Ideology, Compromising information, and Ego”. And goddamn it, these fuckers get every single one of those tickled by the very fuckers that want to destroy this country. It has to be frustrating to see them time and time again sitting up there in the committee acting like some CIA agent that risked their lives trying to keep bad people out of our interests is fucking trying to destroy Donald Trump or some shit. Like, “MY DUDE. Bigger picture here Senator/Representative. Believe it or not, there’s more to all of this shit than some megalomaniac asshat who was once President.” Shocking!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

IT.IS.ALWAYS.PROJECTION.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=db2qFBl494g

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


James Comer, the ambitious chairman of the House of Representatives’ oversight committee, has repeatedly overhyped allegations of bribery and corruption against Biden without once producing hard evidence, according to the Congressional Integrity Project.

“After months of political stunts, dozens of hearings, transcribed interviews, and memos, and despite hours on Fox peddling conspiracy theories, Comer and his Maga crew have failed to find a single shred of evidence linking President Biden to any of their lurid accusations,” says the report by the Congressional Integrity Project, which monitors the Republican investigations.

In early May, Comer and Senator Chuck Grassley, investigating Hunter’s work for the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, published an open letter to the FBI announcing subpoenas for an unclassified document supposedly describing an alleged “criminal scheme involving then-Vice-President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions”.

But when Comer and Grassley obtained the document, form FD-1023, and publicly released a redacted version – against the advice of intelligence officials who feared it would “unnecessarily risks the safety of a confidential source” – it turned out to be an uncorroborated FBI tip.

In June, during a series of interviews with rightwing media, Comer claimed that the supposed bribery allegations against Biden have nothing to do with Rudy Giuliani, the former New York mayor turned lawyer for ex-president Donald Trump.

Kyle Herrig, the Congressional Integrity Project’s executive director, argues Trump’s myriad legal troubles are a motivating factor for Comer and allies ahead of next year’s presidential election.


The original article contains 1,216 words, the summary contains 250 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
32 points

The American Conservative Party: several decades of abject failure.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments