House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Tuesday he is directing House committees to open an impeachment inquiry into President Biden, amid pressure from some hard-right members of the Republican caucus to do so.

The inquiry would center on whether Biden benefited from his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings, among other issues, McCarthy said.

“These are allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption and warrant further investigation by the House of Representatives,” McCarthy told reporters Tuesday morning. “That’s why today I am directing our House committee to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.”

McCarthy spoke for three minutes, did not take any questions and left the lectern shortly after making his remarks. McCarthy has previously said he would not launch an inquiry without a vote by the full house.

The House faces a critical Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avoid a shutdown. McCarthy has been trying to hang on to support for a funding bill from far-right GOP lawmakers, who have been pushing to impeach Biden.

Republican leaders have been weighing whether to use an impeachment inquiry vote as a bargaining chip in the funding negotiations. But it’s not certain that Republicans have the necessary 218 votes to pass it. Some lawmakers are staunchly against it, and McCarthy has said that an impeachment inquiry would occur through a vote on the House floor, as opposed to his unilateral decision-making.

53 points

We have 99 problems, but an impeachment ain’t one.

Housing costs, food costs, education, funding the government, confronting climate change, the war in Europe, and the threat of right-wing terrorism.

These motherfuckers are wasting money and more importantly time to give Trump and his cult a hand job.

#VOTE OUT REPUBLICANS

permalink
report
reply
14 points

This has the same aims as their bullshit Benghazzzzziiiiiiii “investigations” - it is meant to drive down Biden’s numbers in advance of an election.

We can count on the bothsiderist “liberal media” to horse race this again, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yup, CNN and NYT etc are salivating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is all true. But Kevin can lose his position because of these crazy Republicans.

Republicans want to have Biden be a criminal so so bad that this all they think about. But there is no evidence of this and that is a problem for them.

Stop voting for Republicans, they don’t believe in our democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

But there is no evidence of this and that is a problem for them.

Well, not really for that last part. They’ll be able to use this as a headline for their mouthbreathing base - “Biden getting investigated” - and of course we can count on the far right media to tell that to the base, as well as the “liberal media” doing the both sides thing again.

There are still so many idiots that are mad at Hillary + Benghaaaaaaazzzzzi over…something. And all because of the exact same ploy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Rather than wasting time with the impeachment, I’d love to see waste time and kick out McCarthy from the speaker position. Then they can spend another 15 voting periods not electing anyone else to the position, until finally settling on McCarthy again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Good luck, Captain Dipshit. You’ve spent years, and millions of tax dollars failing to find dirt on him, and you’re going ahead with it anyway. And you wonder why the majority of this country find you to be less than intelligent.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It’s par for the course after investigating the Clintons for nearly 30yrs and only coming up with Billy cheating on his wife. Bidens the new Clinton’s as far as Republicans are concerned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We all knew he was a cheater.

We didn’t know he sexually penetrated a (willing and self-motivated tbf) White House employee with a cigar in the Oval Office and had her fellate him while he was on the phone with a Member of Congress.

It was incredibly tawdry and done while working, at his workplace. So as the people reviewing his job performance, Congress had a right to look into it. At the time I certainly expected him to resign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Idiots, the lot of them.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

There is no such thing as a reasonable republican anymore. And frankly, it’s debatable if any of them ever even made it through the Reagan era.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Republicans are utterly useless. What’s he being investigated for? “huuurrr we dunno… stuff!” Great job, Kevin.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

I think we all understand this for the empty nothing-burger it is. That said: Hunter Biden testifying before congress would be hilarious! At least a month of Republicans complaining about how Hunter is rich, attractive, has a huge shlong, does drugs, gets any job he wants, and has women lined up to bang him on-demand.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Comer: “Mr. Biden, be honest, would you say your penis is of average length and girth?”

Hunter unzips his fly and allows his schlong to fall on the table with an audible and heavy thump, drawing gasps and a softly said “Holy shit.” from Nancy Mace, who stares at it as she attempts to compose herself and hide her blushing face

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“Please note, Hunter Biden’s penis has been entered into the record.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

What hasn’t Hunter Biden‘s penis been entered into?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I bet anything MGT has an interest in him…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

From under the shadows of the rafters comes a softly spoken “My precious. Is it huge? Is it tender? We wants it!” as large yellow watery eyes scan the proceedings locking on the massive member laying on the table

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments