65 points

This title almost reads like The Onion.

On a serious note, why? These people (on both sides) have enough money saved, health benefits etc to comfortably retire. Why don’t they? Are they so bought and paid for that their ‘investors’ won’t let them?

permalink
report
reply
31 points

The US legislatures give a lot of power based on seniority. There’s a lot of incentive for a party to keep members in office as long as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Power. And need to feel useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“Need to feel useful” feels like an altruistic decision. I believe most of these people are all but that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What I meant is a retiree crisis. You have been working for 40/50 odd years, and all of a sudden you loose the one thing that gave structure to your life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The need to feel useful isn’t really altruistic. Sure, it can be, but the vast majority of the time it’s a selfish urge to satisfy one’s own dopamine rush of accomplishment mixed with “I’m the only one who can do this” thoughts. Throw in a dash of mental illness and a sprinkling of “this is how we did it in the good ole days”, and it’s more harm than help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe we can increase the laughing stock factor so there’s less of a pull. Maybe then they’ll have some better candidates?

To be fair, after trump biden has a big act to follow and going for a nap hardly cuts the mustard…

I don’t think it’ll work with the batshit crazy politics the us has, just fuels the division

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

When these people are strong and healthy they need to foster the next generations so that the party has a good idea who their successor should be so that there party doesn’t fall into shambles and infighting every time one of them dies or retires.

The problem is that they don’t do that. It is in their interest that there are no viable alternatives to them because good alternatives to them threaten their power. Until they are suddenly 80 that is and nobody knows how to replace them so they have to sit on their thrones and hold on for as long as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Why should they retire? They don’t actually do anything. They figure they might as well be there to soak up the corrupt funds instead of some other placeholder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

People who made it that far up are usually very driven, their job is their whole identity.

It’s probably hard to walk away from something they dedicated so much of their life to. More so if it involved sacrificing time for relationships, family, friends, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Also their job is probably pretty good. I mean, you probably don’t really have bad days the way the rest of the working world does.

I’m self employed and I love what I do, I can’t imagine ever walking away from it. I slow down my pace as I get older, but I won’t stop completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Seniority plays a major role in committee appointments. Sure, you could replace the senile 95 year old who doesn’t know the cold war is over with a younger candidate, but that senile 95 year old has been in Congress for longer than the other guy has been alive, and he’s on some important committees because of it that the younger candidate wouldn’t be able to be in

permalink
report
parent
reply

Some of them have a serious insider trading addiction

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Someone else recently explained it best: It’s elderly abuse.

The entourage encircling these elderly congressional leaders are profiting greatly. As soon as these senators retire, these leeches lose nearly everything.

It’s a Weekend At Bernie’s movie plot, but with extra steps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

No shit? Really? Wow, thanks guys! I never would have guessed that were it not for the hard working folks at the Pentagon!

😐

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Man… the US is not in a good place

permalink
report
reply
25 points

There really needs to be term limits for Congresspeople.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

This would solve the issue without being ableist

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

True, but this is only part of the solution. Term limits can cause the real power locus to move to those unlimited proximate positions. A holistic solution involving congressional term limits, limits on staff and lobbyists, etc that all work in concert to prevent hoarding of power is what’s needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

age limits; term limits have some actual negatives like getting rid of good representatives and increasing corruption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Biden being one of them

permalink
report
reply
13 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

True but, but Trump is not in office, and hopefully will remain that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That sounds like whataboutism… But either way Trump isn’t in office and I’m not sure I agree anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

At least his eyes point in the same direction

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments