26 points

Considering how much stop signs are overused in North America, this is unreasonable. Either replace many stop signs with yield signs where safe to do so, or allow cyclists to pass through stop signs as if it they were yield signs. Holding momentum is important for cyclists.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

While true, in the status quo, blowing through stop signs when other users have the right of way increases the probability of accidents. It puts the responsibility squarely in the person that has to decided whether to stop or not. The one that doesn’t have to stop is simply going their way. If there’s a monetary lapse of judgement on the cyclist’s side, they become a pancake. I’m staying this as someone who regularly “Idaho-maneuvers” in certain places.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Except that data from states which permit Idaho Stops (i.e. treating a stop sign as a yield, and a stop light as a stop sign) has not shown any increase in cyclist danger. The inverse is true, which is why Idaho Stops have been expanding into other states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do the drivers in Indaho know that cyclists are expected to be treating stop signs as yield? My guess is yes. That could be making a difference in the safety profile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s where “as if they were yield signs” and not “as if they weren’t there” comes into play

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I agree. I always make a judgement call when biking, and it doesn’t only benefit me. If I’m going to arrive at a stop sign before a car who will need to cross my path, then if I slow down and stop before continuing, I will take (ever so slightly) more time out of that driver’s day because of how much longer it takes me to speed up.

(Which is why I usually wave drivers through if we’re both stopped, since they can get out of my way much faster than I can get out of theirs. Sharing the road is about consideration and it goes both ways.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Noooooo.

They have those in France and it’s so dangerous! There are so many collisions that happen because of the right of way at intersections.

I’ve driven there and it’s freaking scary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think most European countries are designed this way. In my experience it just takes getting used to and is a bit uncomfortable, but it just feels so much more efficient, whether driving or on a bike. It feels unnecessary to have to stop at every block on a neighborhood street when there’s no one around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The right of way thing I’ve only seen in France in my travels to Europe.

It’s so crazy. You have to assume that you don’t have the right of way, unless there’s a sign that says otherwise. (A yellow diamond with a thick white border) On any roads so you have to stop at every intersection. Not all intersections are obvious, especially in a city like Paris. And if you’re not aware of that rule or you just forget about it, which is easy if you’re foreign, then accidents can happen.

The French are actually thinking about putting up stop signs instead to reduce the number of accidents related to these situations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

As a cyclist, I’ve seen more motorists blow through stop signs than other cyclists, and they are the ones who can kill someone.

Idaho Stops need to come to Canada. Not only have they been proven to be safer, but it makes sense in a dozen different ways.

I’ve sat at red lights (as a cyclist) and the light DOES NOT CHANGE unless a car is waiting at that same light. We’re talking 10+ minutes. Who the hell thinks it’s OK for cyclists to have to sit there indefinitely when no other cars are around, just because of some outdated laws? We need to change with the times!

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

As a Torontonian cyclist, according to what I see, we blow through stop signs way more than cars. Way more. Of course physically we can mostly just harm ourselves.

But yes the rules of the road have to change in this regard. The status quo is clearly car-friendly. Not only it doesn’t prioritize cyclists, but it doesn’t prioritize pedestrians either.

BTW, ebikes help negotiating the status quo a lot. They make stopping at stop signs trivial, as well as keeping a safe speed when riding where there’s no bike lanes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m east of the city, and we don’t have nearly the same amount of cyclists as you do, but only very few ever cautiously ride through a stop sign. I won’t lie, but I did see quite a few cyclists going through stop signs when I was in the city last weekend… not putting anyone in danger, just to save time.

I thought I read about a protest in Toronto where cyclists were stopping at EVERY stop sign as a large group, backing up traffic in an act of malicious compliance. I’d be totally down for that if crazy motorists didn’t turn their rage onto me, rather than onto these outdated rules.

I agree that e-bikes can level the playing field, but the general public shouldn’t need to have a powered bike to have fair rules, either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That protest sounds amazing. Motorists can’t actively rage at a large group of cyclists. 🤭

Yes, ebikes shouldn’t be needed by everyone to cycle safely. The rules are bad and so is the infrastructure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No way man, so many vehicles don’t come to a complete stop. I see it walking, and biking around Toronto. Think right on red - the only time cars come to a complete stop in Toronto is if they’re going to run over someone (and even then that stop them).

And the way our police enforce it here is that they expect a complete foot down stop, on some stretches in Toronto that’s a complete stop every 200m. Or a complete stop on a bike lane with a T intersection where there’s no chance of a car being there.

We were lazy and didn’t bother actually writing different laws for bikes and just sort of grouped them in with cars. And then we have dickheads like TPS or Barrie PD here ticketing cyclists for rolling through a stop sign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I don’t agree that they do it more, but they do it a lot. That’s my anecdata. Now let me join you in toRANting about it.

Stop on right on red is a fucking abomination. No one stops. I have no stats but I bet this is where a huge proportion of pedestrians get maimed. People close to me were run over this way. I was once saved by a bus driver massively honking to warn me that an imbecile was turning right on red from the middle lane, at speed. At first I WTFed at the bus driver, a second later I was running to save myself from the incoming moron.

And the way our police enforce it

Police are enforcing anything? Yes I know this is a topic about cyclist getting ticketed in Barrie, but honestly, I think the TPS have completely abdicated from enforcing any road rules at this point. I will accept being ticketed for stop signs if they enforced those across the board, as well as most other common infractions like right on red, or … straight on red, which is now very common. Enforcement across the board will suck for some things but it will absolutely improve the status quo on the road. Things have gotten pretty bad over the last decade for all road users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

As a cyclist, I’ve seen more motorists blow through stop signs than other cyclists, and they are the ones who can kill someone.

Cyclists always try to use this defense/whataboutism way too often, without realizing that to a pedestrian, you on your bike are just as deadly as a car. Motorists are at least expected to know the rules of the road, cyclists openly oppose any sort of education and even act offended at the idea that they too should know the rules of the road they’re on. As a pedestrian in Toronto, cyclists are my biggest danger, not motorists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

without realizing that to a pedestrian, you on your bike are just as deadly as a car.

Statistically, that’s not true. A car at any speed can kill a pedestrian or cyclist. For a cyclist to kill a pedestrian, which is exceedingly rare, it would take a lot of speed and bad luck to result in a fatality. I don’t think I’ve ever even heard of a cyclist killing a pedestrian at a stop sign.

But to be clear, I don’t advocate for cyclists blowing through stops when there are pedestrians around, since that’s obviously not obeying the right of way. I aim to be a defensive and respectful rider when I’m on my bike.

But I would still like to see more enforcement of stop rules being applied to motorists (and not cyclists on empty roads), since they really are responsible for the vast majority of catastrophic injury and death for pedestrians and cyclists.

At the same time, we can’t ignore that far too many pedestrians put themselves at risk, so everyone has some personal responsibility here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Motorists are at least expected to know the rules of the road, cyclists openly oppose any sort of education and even act offended at the idea that they too should know the rules of the road they’re on. As a pedestrian in Toronto, cyclists are my biggest danger, not motorists.

I think this is the most important part that you are ignoring here.

Certainly, cyclists aren’t as deadly as a motor vehicle. However, cyclists who don’t respect the rules are still very much dangerous.

As the other person said, as a pedestrian I too have been a victim of being hit by cyclists several times because they blew a red light. Several. Times. And each time I lay on the ground while the cyclist yelled and insulted me and ran away.

This has never happened to me with a motorist because the vast motorist respect rules and signage on the road and they understand the consequences.

I, myself, as a cyclist have been a victim of several other cyclists on the road, and in reserved bike lanes, who are not careful or respectful of other cyclists. I’ve been pushed over and ran into by other cyclists.

Attitudes and respect of the rules of the road need to change among cyclists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

For a cyclist to kill a pedestrian, which is exceedingly rare, it would take a lot of speed and bad luck to result in a fatality

Oh good, pedestrians will only need to work about being seriously hurt then, but probably not dead.

If a cop sees a car run the lights, that car will likely get a ticket. In most cases that I’ve seen it’s not that the laws are unenforced so much as there’s nobody with authority to do so witnessing the transgression.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Everyone keeps talking about how bikes can’t hurt pedestrians, meanwhile my wife’s aunt has permanent brain damage cause she got hit by a cyclist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’m not of a fan of the whataboutism either. Many of us are all three. Objectively a pedestrian-cyclist crash is a lot less likely to leave you with a life changing injury than a pedestrian-car crash, purely due to the massive difference in energies involved. In order to get a more accurate intuition for the expected damage, you have to think about the energy involved. That’s given by the speed (squared) times the mass. A light car is about 10x heavier than a cyclist on a bike. For the same speed it has 10x the energy to impact on your bones and tissues. Therefore you should expect a lot more damage. That doesn’t mean that the large number of pedestrian-cyclist near-misses isn’t mentally impactful. They are and they do absolutely happen a lot. Getting scared regularly isn’t healthy or fun. Ironically though, cars going quietly at 30kph don’t feel as scary, yet they will easily maim pedestrians on impact, often permanently. My destroyed subtalar joint from a seemingly minor accident on a crossing can attest to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol car hitting cyclists and pedestrians go vrooom

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No one (at least effectively) thinks it’s ok to keep cyclists waiting indefinitely - they just don’t think about the cyclist experience at all. Bad intersections are windshield bias at its peak

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ohio allows this. If the red doesn’t detect your bike it you can treat it as a yield

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

As it should!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Stop signs should be treated as “yield” and red lights should be treated as “stop”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Everyone stops at a stop sign. Cars, buses, pedestrians, motorized wheelchairs, and bikes. This is not an issue that needs separate rules for cyclists. Perhaps they can re-evaluate that intersection, does it need a sign? If cyclists can easily coast through the intersection, the need for a stop sign is up for discussion. Perhaps a Yield sign.

My area has lights for intersections with more than 2 lanes per direction of travel, roundabouts for smaller busy roads, and most of the residential intersections don’t have signage. Stop signs are, mostly, used to slow traffic down.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I disagree. The Idaho stop is a very real law and it’s been proven safe. There absolutely should be a different rule for cyclists and we already have decades of proof that it not only works but increases safety.

Also, pedestrians don’t stop at stop signs currently. It’s perfectly legal for them to continue without any kind of stop and I’m not aware of any place on earth that requires pedestrians to stop or has ever given a ticket for the them failing to stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Eh, there have been people who have gotten a jaywalking ticket in an intersection after they were hit by a car.

Not common and my city is apparently hostile to anything not on four wheels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
3 points
*

To be fair, they break rules cars are supposed to follow as well. I’ve seen plenty roll through stop signs, right turns at stop lights, fail to signal lane changes, etc, all without their lights on.

We need to have a better way to keep law enforcement accountable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Folks, I think with this wholesome standard-fare cars vs bikes who-dun-it rant fest, we’ve really arrived on Lemmy. I feel home. Thank you. ♥️

permalink
report
reply

Bicycles

!bicycles@lemmy.ca

Create post

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you’re a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules

  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.

  • No porn.

  • No ads / spamming.

  • Ride bikes


Other cycling-related communities

Community stats

  • 388

    Monthly active users

  • 277

    Posts

  • 3K

    Comments

Community moderators