223 points

“I do not want any kind of rainbow display especially in this month.” Imagine hating the idea of diversity so much that any kind of rainbow offends you. These people won’t stop until the entire world is gray.

permalink
report
reply
101 points

Man, these people are gonna be unhinged once they find out a rainbow is our visible light spectrum and that we technically see it everywhere. The kicker is that “God” put it there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Oh boy are they unhinged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

“Give it back”. Apparently god isn’t powerful enough to take it back himself. Weirdest game of keep away ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

When your political project is ‘make everyone as miserable as I am’, whining about every goddamn thing is actually a kind of praxis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

You should see the comments on instagram reels whenever a teacher posts something and there’s a rainbow in the background, like just a rainbow on the wall in a kindergarten class or something, so many people absolutely fucking lose their minds and spew the most vile shit at these teachers, it’s bizarre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Why are they able to so quickly swarm and find these posts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s how social media works. All it takes is one person to find it and post it to their network.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Hate is a powerful motivator 

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They don’t have a life + they are on instagram

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

These people won’t stop until the entire world is gray white.

FTFY.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

They won’t stop until all the LGBTQ people (and Jews, people of color, etc) are dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why do I feel like such an event would just make population epigenetics LGBTQ even harder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
191 points

“I do not want any kind of rainbow display especially in this month. We have a conservative town and as a library do not need to make political statements (see Target and Budlight as negative examples). I certainly do not want the library to promote LGBTQ agendas.”

Ah, and removing them is not a political statement?

permalink
report
reply
142 points

Remember, it’s only “political” when it’s something they don’t like.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
*

Wrong reply…

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Well yeah, there are only two sexualities: straight and political ^/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And there’s only two genders. Male and political. Two races. White and political.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

To the quoted hate-filled fuck: Existing without being persecuted isn’t a goddamn agenda you piece of shit. The only agenda I see here is your fascist one. Try keeping your shit to yourself and learn to let people be instead of trying to stamp them out, ignorant fuckstick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Tell them it’s to celebrate the receding flood waters and God’s promise to never do it again.

That should shut them up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

No, then they’ll just blame it on

[takes deep breath]

“THE JOOOOOOOOOOOZ!!!1!1!!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
142 points

I’m sure they would also happily attempt elimination of neurodivergent people.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Maybe but they also might just do away with all psychiatric treatments, who needs “happy pills” for depression when you can just praise the Lord?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I think they want to replace psychiatry with exorcism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Back to the sanatoriums but this time with more Jesus

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Praise the Lord and pasd the Ammunition!

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Well that’s the next step.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Indeed. No question about that at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Until they realize how neuro divergent they all are, they just hide it all in cult nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Asa neurodivergent person, I’m insulted at being grouped with all the hateful bigots. Yes, I’m sure some of them are neurodivergent (just by sheer chance), but being a hateful bigot doesn’t mean that they are neurodivergent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh %100 I agree. I’m not implying one means the other. I’m implying they are too ignorant to understand what being neuro divergent is. I’m ND as well, and even “normal people” have trouble understanding it. I doubt a redneck who thinks cartoons will torn his kid gay gets it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
131 points

I don’t understand how having a rainbow nearby isn’t protected by 1st amendment rights.

permalink
report
reply
-50 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Whataboutism at it’s finest folks

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Edit: Also for the record, it’s not “whataboutism” because a religious book was part of the display with the symbol for neuro divergence. Just fyi.

“The display also included the books Emma & Mommy Talk to God, The Color Purple, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Separate is Never Equal, Wonder, and To Kill a Mockingbird.”

No, it’s not. It’s an example for you to understand. Religion, particular Christianity, is everywhere in some parts of the US. Most people probably don’t even notice. To others, a rainbow is the same way. It’s a pretty decoration just like a cross or the signs up in my kid’s school, In God We Trust. No one would say a cross is political, but it is absolutely in support of, and in certain locations, normalizing that religion should exist here. And there are absolutely people who advocate unless you are one particular religion or subset of that religion you are not a “real” American.

It makes sense to equate showing Christian paraphernalia with showing support for LGBTQ, or in this case neuro divergent people, because of how two sides see them. I’m not Christian. I don’t want my children raised Christian or in any particular religion for that matter. But they are being exposed to multiple aspects of religion every day in school. Is that not indoctrination, however subtle? Those who argue against the pride flag being shown in public insist that the publicity of the flag indoctrinates children.

Now which is actually correct? Does a flag celebrating differences make it more likely that children will be non-heteronormative or neuro divergent? Or does it make it more likely that the children will feel accepted and not hide who they are? Does exposing children to multiple parts of religious practices make it more likely that those children will believe that said religion is true and more likely to hide if they don’t believe it because everyone around them seems to?

In your view are pride flags political? If so, why? Who made them about politics?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Because….edgy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Because pick a different political symbol that you dont agree with and reevaluate the situation

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Someone didn’t read the article. I’m just gonna go full bore at the get go. Be very careful how you use your frozen peaches son, cuz you’re actually posting in a .de instance with rules against promoting nazism.

Which you aren’t doing yet, of course. And you won’t. Will you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-122 points

Probably because that’s not how the first amendment works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

IANAL but, if it’s a publicly owned and operated library, and someone acting on behalf of the government fired these people for some sort of protected speech (which isn’t always just talking/writing) then I’m pretty sure that’s a 1a violation.

Though I could use some clarity on any distinction between a persons own speech, and speech that could be seen as that of the library.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Only kind of related, but I just learned from another Lemmy thread that while public nudity is illegal in major cities in Oregon, if you are riding a bicycle while nude, it is considered “speech protected under the first amendment” because it can reasonably be assumed you are protesting against cars.

https://www.oregonlive.com/news/2008/11/judge_throws_out_charges_again.html

permalink
report
parent
reply

Strange how certain types incorrectly construe constitutional right violations with businesses but completely overlook state enforcement as literal infringement by government. Big gubmint isn’t just federal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Would you like to explain it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m guessing https://xkcd.com/1357/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Freedom of speech is the right to not be punished by the government, not private people.

I could be fired from a job for saying I like the Ninja Turtles and the newest remake wasn’t that bad. But the govt can’t do shit about my awesome movie choices.

Now this is a library, so I think it would come down to who runs it and their policies. For example, I was in the USMC and while I uniform I couldn’t openly support any political stances or party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

I am old enough to remember the rainbow colors being a secret way for the community to find each other. We’d put a small rainbow on our cars, or other places and people of our community knew what that meant.

Now that we are more out of the closet, hateful bigots know what the rainbow flag means too. This is an expected downside to our communities progress. But we will never go back in the closet.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

I’m a straight biological male and love rainbows. Colours are pretty! Not sure why anyone would get upset about rainbows. You know, the NATURALLY occurring thing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
12 points

Such a depressing world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Bingo. As a Pink Floyd fan I remember seeing bigots complain about the gay “rainbow” with the anniversary of Dark Side of the Moon.

I use to have a tee shirt that said “Which one’s Pink?” And non Pink Floyd fans thinking it was a gay reference instead of a song lyric asking who is Pink Floyd".

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Prisms are part of the woke agenda, along with any refraction. #cancelRefraction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You know they get upset at all kinds of Science shit that’s for liberals and nerds. Rainbows are no different.

Another cis straight male here btw. Rainbows are awesome in more ways than one. And how could you be a sensible person and not be an ally to those who would prefer not to be oppressed for stupid reasons?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not the only reason by any stretch, but Christians love to claim that no one else can use rainbows because of that myth where their god used one to apologize for one of his many mass genocides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I want a way to signal to people, sorry I’m freaking weird and apologies in advance for my awkwardness.

I’ve always loved the infinity symbol, got it engraved on a ring for my partner over a decade ago.

I also love badges.

Considering finding an enamel rainbow infinity badge online - and if someone mistakes me as queer, I don’t mind, I’m an ally and a bit bi anyway.

Bigots get way too hung up on symbols.

I like to think of symbols as positive things - either covert ways to communicate with like minded people in an unfortunately negative environment, or ways to show pride in something if the symbol is widely recognised.

When that pride is something includes infringement on the rights of others, then we have a problem.

Otherwise, yay, go wild.

Yes, officer, I’ve had a few drinks - why do you ask?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think a lot of the bigots out there with a religious background have been conditioned to put a LOT into simple symbols.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Different challenges these days for sure. As glad as I am in a place when I do not have to resort to spy codes just to feel like myself I still find the modern ones to be kind of great. Like every stripe of the LGBTQIA has their own hidden messages. Like if I saw a Blahaj Ikea shark wearing a bandana around it’s “waist” chomping on a piece of garlic bread surrounded by toadstools I would be like… Well that’s basically a pride flag.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments