Nobody could have predicted this. I have my doubts even when they call it “spying equipment” or whatever considering Chinese claim it was a meteorological balloon, certainly no doubt they would try to paint those tools as such.

108 points

article is about how it wasn’t actually spying

Constantly refers to it as Chinese spy balloon

permalink
report
reply

Fucking liars are STILL saying it was a spy balloon when the military is like no, actually, it wasn’t.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

You clearly didn’t read the article. It WAS a spy balloon but it appears the spy equipment wasn’t turned on. So no information was gathered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

the article presents zero evidence that it’s a “spy balloon”, just some dipshit general saying that it is. we know the U.S. military regularly lies about its enemies, so his word is worth nothing

did you ever stop to ask why a supposed “spy balloon” would be so large and easily noticed?

permalink
report
parent
reply

lib@lemm.ee

And you read the article yet you didn’t even quote the funny bit.

Martin said, “On paper, it looks like this colossal mismatch – one of this country’s most sophisticated jet fighters against a balloon with a putt-putt motor. Was it a sure thing?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply

Somehow we’ve managed to find the first human being to function without a single neuron firing.

A brain exists, but nothing is occuring within. No electrical signals, no neural activity.

And yet they manage to post anyway

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I’m still getting used to federation. I saw that comment, didn’t look at the poster’s name, and assumed it was just sarcasm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I really hope this is a bit

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The article makes no claim as to the nature of the balloon. The author is very careful about that. It’s a balloon that didn’t collect any intelligence nor transmit any data. How, exactly, would you define a spy balloon? It’s starting to sound like your threshold for “spy balloon” is “launched by some Chinese person,” which is probably more than a little racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Your name is Occam’s Razor, but you don’t seem very good at using Occam’s Razor

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Reminder that the missile they used to shoot this balloon down cost $400k

permalink
report
reply
61 points

And one missed

permalink
report
parent
reply

And in the immense wave of paranoia afterwards they shot down three American weather balloons at the cost of 400k per missile plus fuel and maintenance and man hours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

And one of them was a child’s science project

permalink
report
parent
reply

Doesn’t an F-35 cost something stupid like 40k an hour to operate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

greatest military in the world no doubt

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

They love to talk all that shit about “our missiles are so accurate that we can hit a ladybug” or some such level of nonsense. Which all of a sudden goes away every time that it is shown how many more people were killed while trying to get one person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes. This alone should disqualify Biden from being president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Name a president in the past century that wouldn’t have done the exact same thing.

This is actually the most American thing Biden has ever done lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

Is that before or after the flight time on the plane they launched it from?

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

That’s just the direct cost of the missile itself. The cost of flying the $200m jet I’m unsure of!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

It’s 70k per hour lmao. Amortized though so just 1 hour probably costs at least 100k

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

The DoD is the world’s largest employer with 2.9 million employees as of June 2022. Besides its direct function of projecting US power, it is also functionally a jobs program. The US is ideologically prohibited from handing out money for free via welfare programs, they must maintain the ideology of capitalism, by creating pointless work by which these people can “earn” the money. It is of zero consequence that each missile costs so many dollars. The whole point of its manufacture was to pay the workers and to allow the military-industrial capitalists to skim excess off the top of this waste. It’s a sham but it is a little more complicated than just lighting $400k on fire. That money was already spent, and they want these missiles used in order to justify their replacement. As an additional benefit, each of these 2.9 million employees is heavily propagandized by the state department every day at work.

Long-term, it benefits the US if the industry and its warfighters are permanently ready to fight a war.

I don’t agree with any of it btw, just adding some context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Here we go. This is the “retraction” they do 6 months after flooding the headlines with bullshit, this way they can say that they “correct themselves” and are therefore unbiased.

Of course, even this headline is still implying it is a “spy balloon” so they can technically correct wrong information they put out while also knowing that 90% of their audience will never read it, but will believe them when they say they are “unbiased” for correcting themselves.

I can’t imagine how anyone with a soul and brain could be a western journalist at this point, you must be lacking one of those two things. They’re shadier and more dishonest than lawyers.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Hey! Don’t say such things about lawyers

permalink
report
parent
reply

literal weather balloon and the sensors weren’t even on lmao

“freight truck of spy equipment”

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.9K

    Posts

  • 139K

    Comments