Democrat Hal Rafter won by 12 points in a state House district that went narrowly for Donald Trump in 2020.

Try deleting cookies if you hit a paywall.

11 points
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We need a bot to post these links.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Republican Party’s increasing Trump-era tendency toward more extreme nominees and its struggles to account for the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade have already cost it plenty.

If unpopular GOP nominees in key states had merely matched the political fundamentals, Republicans might have held the Senate for the duration of Joe Biden’s presidency and had a much more significant House majority with which to work today.

Whether Democrats will ultimately tie the chamber and, if so, for how long, is to be determined; the New Hampshire state House’s 400 members make it the third-largest English-speaking legislative body in the world, which means frequent vacancies.

Someone who was apparently in Washington on Jan. 6 because Trump was the only “person who has stood up to Pedophilia, Sex Trafficking of Children, and Satanic Worship,” the candidate posted on Facebook.

After Guzofski’s defeat, Republican state Rep. Ross Berry remarked to the New Hampshire Journal, “If you cozy up to and campaign with former president Donald Trump, you can expect to lose votes.”

“No amount of money, campaigning, or deep roots to your community will overcome the voters’ absolute rejection of Trump-affiliated candidates in New Hampshire,” Berry added.


The original article contains 687 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Love it. Get fucked assholes.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Yep, me too. Fuck em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I live in New Hampshire, and these motherfuckers and their asinine policies have fucked up our school system so bad, it might never recover.

They stole one hundred million dollars to give to private schools and line their pockets.

They fucked up the remote learning during the heart of the pandemic.

And a lot of them are free staters and those motherfuckers should be drove into the sea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I remember keenly how the day after January 6th, even Republicans knew what happened. Then when they saw their psychotic base wanted to remain blind and stupid, they developed a convenient amnesia.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

It’s not like they’ll learn anything… reaction could be “we need to pretend to be less extreme” or “we need to be more extreme and just better at voter suppression”

permalink
report
reply
15 points

It’s always double down on Trumpism. No need to worry about any attempt at backtracking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s a fundamental flaw. They’re unable to admit making a mistake. Rather than being a sign of weakness, acknowledging errors is the first step to correcting them. I think this is why they keep failing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 413K

    Comments