With such a push against single use plastic and mirco plastics etc. Why is glitter left untouched? surely it has to be one of the worse plastic pollutants. Currently getting our Christmas shop ready, and its on everything and gets everywhere!

57 points

Seeing the comments here and people donโ€™t even realise how widespread glitter is. Itโ€™s in everything and used in a variety of industries. From pharmaceuticals to construction, to transport, vehicles, militaryโ€ฆ in fact the one of the biggest consumers of glitter is kept secret so who knows, could be the military. It wonโ€™t surprise me. We really need to find an alternative.

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*

I thought i read somewhere that the biggest consumers of glitter are the auto makers because itโ€™s in nearly all the paint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

That sparkly quartz kitchen top? Yeahโ€ฆcrushed quartz and glitter to make it sparkle. As I said, itโ€™s everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Interesting. Not surprising, but thatโ€™s one I didnโ€™t think about.

Still, thatโ€™s one use thatโ€™s not making anything worse, right? I mean, that counter is going to be used for decades, and when it does go to the landfill, the glitter in it is hardly going to make a difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I see you watched that YouTube video too ๐Ÿ˜‰

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
1 point

This is from 2014. Can you still buy these products in the US?

At least in the EU, solid microplastics within cosmetics have been forbidden since 2018 (silicones etc. are still allowed unfortunately).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hmm so it would seem. Most recent thing I found was from 11m ago and says the toothpaste theory is bunk but no real answer has been found.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Iโ€™ll never argue in favor of glitter, but if weโ€™re discussing micro plastics thereโ€™s this:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-43023-x

All the synthetic shit cloth you wear and/or sleep on has impact.

Likely to make more impact on this microplastic by buying cotton or bamboo than trying to ban glitter.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Damn, dude. I never even thought of synthetic fabrics as a source. Plastic is one of the worst things we could have ever made.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Itโ€™s also one of the most useful things weโ€™ve ever made. Medical devices alone. The problem is mismanagement and overuse for profit by bad actors who lied to the world and said not to worry cause itโ€™s all being reused again and again in this closed feedback loop called recycling

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

100% cotton gang on standby

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Iโ€™d be surprised if there isnโ€™t a company making biodegradable glitter

permalink
report
reply
15 points

The thing about glitter is, that it is often the waste from other processes cut up finely. You need those processes to use environmentally safe sheets of shiny paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

For 15 times the price

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Iโ€™d buy it for 30x the price. 10 years after having two girls get ready for the millennium in my bathroom (which involved the liberal spraying of glitter) I could still find that shit in crevices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

one quick DDG search, first result: https://thegoodglitter.com/

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I find their suggestions for DIY glitter questionable, and I couldnโ€™t tell you if all the articleโ€™s information is accurate, but Sustainable Jungleโ€™s evaluation of current biodegradable glitters is worth a read, if youโ€™re interested in glitter formulas.

Tl;dr There is active research into cellulose nanocrystals for glitter, which would still have some ecologically negative impacts, but otherwise everything on the market is likely greenwashing, to various degrees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Edible glitter already exists. Iโ€™d have to imagine that it is also biodegradable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I wouldnโ€™t think it would have to be biodegradable, just inert and non-poisonous

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Does that mean I can make my poop glitter?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ooh I didnโ€™t know that, interesting stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply

Iโ€™d be surprised if there is, seeing as glitter is made from plastic and aluminium

Itโ€™s also apparently used in certain types of kitchen surfaces (quartz or granite if iโ€™m not mistaken) to give them a sparkly finish, not too sure people would be happy to find their kitchen surfaces shine โ€œbiodegradedโ€ and looking duller after half a century lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The biggest culprits are probably polyester and acrylic fabrics, plus tiresโ€ฆ and there isnโ€™t likely to be a will to do anything about those. But yeah, glitter is annoying.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Glitter is a novelty in every use case, though.

Polyester is too, but itโ€™s a substantial and noticeable difference and improvement (a milestone even) as a life comfort. Glitter is just nice to look at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Overall, there is just not a lot of plastic in glitter. Itโ€™s incredible thin. Itโ€™s like aluminium foil, while we use a lot of meters of foil as households, the kg used is quite little given the surface. And glitter is the same. Getting everyone to buy one less plastic chair is more than theyโ€™ll use up in glitter over their entire life, basically.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Ah so itโ€™s just tiny tiny little harmless microplastics. That shouldnโ€™t be of any concernโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜‘

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Not compared to the amount of microplastic larger products with degrade into.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Glitter isnโ€™t microplastics.

Like, Iโ€™m not saying glitter is not a problematic and rather needless product, but on the list of problematic and rather needless products to get people away from itโ€™s quite far down the list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Surely nothing is less use than glitter?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The concern is that glitter is smaller and harder to dispose of responsibly. Itโ€™s likely to end up polluting the ground or the water, as opposed to something like a chair, which, having less surface area, and being disposed of as a whole piece after some decades, is not actually going to bleed that much.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, itโ€™s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 319K

    Comments