With such a push against single use plastic and mirco plastics etc. Why is glitter left untouched? surely it has to be one of the worse plastic pollutants. Currently getting our Christmas shop ready, and its on everything and gets everywhere!

22 points

The biggest culprits are probably polyester and acrylic fabrics, plus tires… and there isn’t likely to be a will to do anything about those. But yeah, glitter is annoying.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Glitter is a novelty in every use case, though.

Polyester is too, but it’s a substantial and noticeable difference and improvement (a milestone even) as a life comfort. Glitter is just nice to look at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
-8 points

I’ve never seen glitter used outside the context of 7 year old girls or pride parades.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

It’s everywhere at festivals

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And boat shows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And Christmas decorations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Overall, there is just not a lot of plastic in glitter. It’s incredible thin. It’s like aluminium foil, while we use a lot of meters of foil as households, the kg used is quite little given the surface. And glitter is the same. Getting everyone to buy one less plastic chair is more than they’ll use up in glitter over their entire life, basically.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Ah so it’s just tiny tiny little harmless microplastics. That shouldn’t be of any concern… 😑

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Not compared to the amount of microplastic larger products with degrade into.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Glitter isn’t microplastics.

Like, I’m not saying glitter is not a problematic and rather needless product, but on the list of problematic and rather needless products to get people away from it’s quite far down the list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Surely nothing is less use than glitter?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The concern is that glitter is smaller and harder to dispose of responsibly. It’s likely to end up polluting the ground or the water, as opposed to something like a chair, which, having less surface area, and being disposed of as a whole piece after some decades, is not actually going to bleed that much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think most glitters you can buy around here are biodegradable so that

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

around here

Was the key word

I know what glitter is but there’s both edible and biodegradable glitter.

The latter is what I was referring to.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 319K

    Comments