184 points

Yeah I’m into Gitness

Gitness goddamn code to compile

permalink
report
reply
14 points

You’re down with the Gitness?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We’re done. This guy wins the Internet. We can all go home now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The one person who downvoted this couldn’t get their code to compile

permalink
report
parent
reply

Looks like they redacted their downvote

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Coward

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Gitness balls into your mouth

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Gottem

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Looks interesting, although the comments about other git repo services being bloated, complicated, and resource heavy, followed by a paragraph about AI features that have been added, with more planned in the future, seems a touch ironic to me.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

My first thought is that it’s just an AI training move

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Isn’t the whole point of these things the “bloated” (CI/CD, issue tracker, merge requests, mirroring, etc) part? Otherwise we’d all be using bare git repos over ssh (which works great btw!)

It’s like complaining about IDE bloat while not using a text editor. Or complaining there’s too many knives in a knife set instead of buying just the chef knife.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Actually, I do use git bare repos for CD too. :) The ROOT/hooks/post-update executable can be anything, which allows to go wild : on my laptop, a push to a bare repos triggers deploy to all the machines needing it (on local or remote networks), by pushing through ssh to other bare repos hosted there, which builds and installs locally, given they all have their own post-update scripts ; all of that thanks to a git push and scripts at the proper paths. I don’t think any forge could do it more conveniently.

For me the main interest of forges is to publish my code and get it discovered (before GitHub, getting people to find your repos hosted on your blog’s server was a nightmare). Even for the collaboration, I could do with emails. That being said, most people aren’t on top of their inbox, in which mails from family are mixed with work mails and commercial spam in one giant pile of unread items, so it’s a good thing for them we have those issue trackers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I find that claim so dubious. Like they list running on the smallest VMs as a feature but give no specific requirements for hosting or running the service. This whole article reads like buzzword salad. I question if the creators even know what a git forge is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

There hasn’t been a new Git repo launch in almost a decade

Am I the only person annoyed they seem to mistake repositories for forges? It’s already annoying when casual users say “git” for “GitHub”, but those guys actually want to build a forge, explaining they’re going to do better than anyone else. Maybe start by properly using the terms?

permalink
report
reply
24 points

And of course there have been forges launched, including SourceHut, Gitea, Gogs, Forgejo…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Gitea, Gogs, Forgejo

“They are the same picture.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Here I am knowing the difference between git and GitHub, GitLab, …

But what’s a ‘forge’ please ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

That’s the name we use to designate software like GitHub, GitLab and similar, which provide repositories hosting and tooling like issue trackers. It’s supposed to be named like that because of SourceForge, the oldest of such tools, although I didn’t hear the term “forge” before the last 5 years or so, long after SourceForge demise, so I imagine there is a bit of nostalgia in this name (not sure who is nostalgic of SourceForge, though 😂). The wikipedia page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forge_(software)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

SOURCEFORGE: I’m not dead yet!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So, a web front end to git ? Why do you say SourceForge is dead, there are many open source projects on SourceForge, are they at risk of disappearing ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

@Valmond @Anafroj gitlab, GitHub, sourceforge are forges. They use a tool to manage source code : git.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I myself have launched several new git repos in the last decade. Where’s my article TechCrunch?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I complained when the term “crypto” was co-opted. Come die with me on this hill where we care about things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Also plain wrong - Codeberg launched in 2019. Now the question is: did the author just not know better, or is he paid not to know?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Codeberg isn’t an entirely new forge. It’s just a well-known gitea/forgejo instance. Sourcehut would probably be a better example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Thank you for the correction! Then it’s also wrong due to Gitea which launched in 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The worst part is that this is a direct quote from Harness’ CEO, not from TechCrunch author. :) Maybe they have a great product, I don’t know, but it certainly feels like an amateurish launch. :D

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, if a CEO has to lie to make their product seem better, it’s blacklisted in my mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I thought you were being overly pedantic but my god, they keep repeating the point. They seem to have no idea what the difference between a platform hosting code repositories and an individual repository is or even what version control software is. What the bloody hell is this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

At the very least, it means the CEO doesn’t understand the domain. It may be because he sees this part of the business as secondary and less important, or because it was developed so fast he didn’t have time to grasp the concepts, probably he was not a driving force in that effort. I certainly hope the tech side is more aware. Without more proof of CEO implication, I certainly would not bet on that horse to survive in the distant future, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Im amused that the repo for it is on github and not on, well, Gitness

permalink
report
reply
9 points

total power move

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Nobody name their new product Gitler for some reason. Such a good name.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

The logo writes itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 79K

    Comments