Experts say even if it claims to be “microwave-safe.”

159 points
*

I’m not sure food blogs are the best choice for this. The article goes on to talk about BPA and phthlates, but neither of those exist in pure HDPE or PP.

BPA is found in polycarbonate plastics (acrylic) (Edit: brain lapse, acrylic is PMMA) and epoxy resins. Phthalates are in PVC (vinyl). Using the word ‘plastic’ as a monomer mononym (Edit: lol wrong mono) is dangerous for many reasons, and causation vs correlation is one reason why.

I mean, definitely go with glass if you have the choice, sure, but let’s also actually try to be accurate if we invoke the scientific method.

I would also love for there to be really robust testing of food containers of all varieties direct at the manufacturers, with heavy fines involved if they’re using additives but claiming it’s a food-safe plastic.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Here’s the study in question. Can’t speak to the authenticity of it but off the top I don’t see anything shady

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It doesn’t look shady, but I can only access the abstract which just says “plastics” and doesn’t specify that part further, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

One of the biggest travesties today is that so many scientific studies are locked behind pay walls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

For me, it has a picture where it specifies a “polypropylene container”.

There’s also this bit from near the end of the abstract:

Additionally, the polyethylene-based food pouch released more particles than polypropylene-based plastic containers. Exposure modeling results suggested that the highest estimated daily intake was 20.3 ng/kg·day for infants drinking microwaved water and 22.1 ng/kg·day for toddlers consuming microwaved dairy products from polypropylene containers.

So, they’re, at least, discussing polypropylene and polyethylene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

BPA is found in polycarbonate plastics (acrylic) […]

Polycarbonate (BPA monomer) is a very different polymer to acrylic/PMMA (methyl methacrylate monomer).

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Oops, my mistake. I’ve been looking at too many acrylics and polycarbonates for use in a non-food setting. Thanks for the correction!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Love all the edits. Thanks for the informative comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I try to keep it honest and accurate, I would hate to spread more misinformation accidentally. If only my long-covid memory were a little more cooperative!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bon Appetit has been in publication since 1956. It’s unfair to call it a food blog. (I can’t speak to the specifics of plastics that you referred to, just the fact of dismissing the magazine).

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Fair, I was too casual in my assessment of Bon Appetit. I have nothing against food blogs though, for what it’s worth.

I should probably have said: “I don’t think that Condé Nast food and entertainment magazines containing Amazon affiliate links are necessarily a great source for the latest accurate and objective health and science information.” I would read a recipe on their site though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know, Ars Technica has had some of the best coverage of the recent AI boom over the past handful of years. Extremely realistic, accurate and at times demonstrates a knowledge that shows the writers have actually put in some hours using and understanding some of the AI tools they write about

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I don’t think that’s the point. Bon Appétit specializes in food and its preparation, not science. It’s difficult to know if what your source is saying is legitimate if you don’t have the education needed to truly understand what they’re talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bon Appetit is and has always been racists, classicist trash. I oppose them on ethical grounds, they’re not a journalism publication, they’ve always been a trashcan level magazine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Here’s the thing. If the plastic is not microwave safe, then it is not any-sort-of-heat safe. The microwave is simply a heating device. The method is different but at the end of day, it vibrates molecules to heat em up.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Most people wouldn’t put plastic on a stovetop or in an oven to begin with. Where else is plastic typically heated with food in it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Most fast food restaurants and food processing plants. Hot dogs in the plastic casing as they are heated in the factory. Fast food (taco places have meat bags that they heat up before cutting open for use).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Plenty of sit down restaurants too. Your side of veggies or mash potatoes came in a plastic container with butter and salt added, and is then microwaved. Nicer places will often finish some of those sides on a grill or stovetop, but you already got plastic’d

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe in a sous vide? But a separate issue will be already-quite-hot food being put into plastic. Think they let your takeout noodles/soup cool before putting it in a plastic container?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

When you put hot food in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Baby bottles. We use a bottle warmer that heats the bottle with steam, but yeah, I’d say breast milk/formula counts. That being said, I don’t think I’ve ever seen bottles not rated as being safe for bottle warmers? And you’d never put a bottle in a microwave (process is too harsh on breast milk and consequently ruins much of its nutritional value, not sure about formula).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Don’t bother. The people who believe this shit, want to

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I’ve switched to mostly glass, metal, and wood kitchenware, but even those have plastic lids. I try to get paper milk jugs, which I thought were lined with wax, but apparently are plastic? It’s almost impossible to get away from this shit.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

If it makes you feel any better the milk, and all the foods you eat, already contain micro-plastics 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

gee thanks I do feel better

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Paper stuff that is meant to hold liquids will always be just a plastic bag with carton structure. Wax would be fine if you were filling and storing the liquid in your own home. But wax lined paper would never survive the shortest of transportation. Completely non-feasible for industrial scale agriculture. Soft drinks in cans also have plastic linings, metals are more resistant but would also eventually corrode in the midterm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the wax was a sealant to make it easy to ship and prevent rotting. “one bad apple spoils the bunch” literally, so coat em in wax so the mould doesn’t spread as much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I never put this kind of plastic on the microwave. But I also worry about paper plates, which have some kind of polyethylene coating that is really really hard to find any info about online. Ive fucking eaten cheese that has been boiled on a “paper” plate, only to find that those plates were coated in some kind of polymer.

By the way, the insides of aluminum cans are coated in plastic.

Sweet dreams!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

There is plastic in everything you consume now. You can’t get away from it unless you retreat to the wilderness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Uh, they found a plastic bag in the Mariana Trench. No place is free of it, anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Nope, plastic there as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Doubt that’s the case anymore. I’m in the flexible packaging industry and we had to go PFAS free reeeeeal quick. .

PFAS based processing aids allowed us to run higher quality product at higher production rates with longer machine uptime.

All for the low low cost of microplastics everywhere all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And in those PFAS? Microplastics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Why? Like, is this equivilant to ‘smoking cigarettes will kill you?’ Or more, ‘going within ten metres of a running automobile will kill you?’ Because stress and anxiety will kill you dead too. So…

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

I suspect the next generation will be horrified that people ever cooked in plastic. Or ate or drank out of plastic. They’ll think of it the same way we think of lead pipes now.

The evidence of terrible health effects of plastic seems to be adding up very fast. Pthalates, PFAS, and microplastics all seem to be implicated in the increasing rates of ill health, cancer and cardiovascular disease.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<— rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments