The death of Sen. Dianne Feinstein places Gov. Gavin Newsom under intense pressure to quickly name a replacement as a bitterly divided Congress votes on a spending plan in the coming hours to avert a government shutdown.

Newsom had hoped to avoid the politically charged decision of selecting a second senator. But he will need to move swiftly as a budget standoff has the government on the verge of shutting down, and Senate Democrats could need every vote. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) affirmed on Friday that the fast-moving political situation creates an imperative for Newsom to make a difficult decision quickly.

“He, you know, wants to be respectful and not name somebody while folks are still grappling with their grief,” Kaine said, but “we cannot afford to be one down. We really can’t.”

The timing of Feinstein’s death — four months before a primary but more than a year before the end of her term — complicates this election cycle. Staff at the California secretary of state’s office was huddling early Friday morning to determine the timelines that would govern an appointment or a possible special election.

154 points

If he didn’t already have someone in the wings to replace a seriously ailing 90 year old, then I’m going to consider him incompetent.

permalink
report
reply
-53 points

lol there is plenty more reasons than this to consider him incompetent

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Yup.

Especially after the controversy with the “I would like to vote…” bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The problem is he made conflicting statements…he said he would appoint a black woman to fill the demographic gap created by harris-padilla, and said he won’t appoint someone who plans to run in the election as an incumbent has an advantage he thinks dilutes the will of the voters in an open field. It puts him in a bad spot with Barbara Lee, a totally self-inflicted political pickle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Remember, as awful as she was, there are 49 Republican senators who are infinitely worse.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

They are both systemic issues, and ranking them by “bad” is not particularly important. Ranking them by changeable is. Which is to say, either promote acceleration or term limits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The context is very relevant, because while party infighting is great, it’s absolutely vital to keep some perspective.

Feinstein was awful, but not let-trump-get-away-with-sedition awful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

“He, you know, wants to be respectful and not name somebody while folks are still grappling with their grief,”

What a load of crap.

She was 90, everyone knew this was coming, arguably she’d already left the building a while ago, and this is politics not a private family gathering.

They’re delaying because they want to be seen as respectful. It’s optics. That’s all.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

What a pessimistic take. We should be expecting this kind of behavior from our politicians, not denigrating or whenever we see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is how I see it, if you needed heart surgery but the surgeon died and the chief decided not to hire a new heart surgeon until everyone’s fee fee feels got better and you died would you applaud the chief for being respectful? Fuck no and I’m sorry but she has been basically dead for at least a year and the second she was pronounced dead they should have been swearing in a replacement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They’re delaying because they want to be seen as respectful. It’s optics. That’s all.

You realize they all knew each other quite well, they were all in the same inner circles, right?

That maybe, just maybe, they’re actual human beings and they actually do want to pay respect?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

“Dear passengers, we apologize for the delay, but one of our pilots pilot died last week, we all knew them quite well, and we feel really bad about it, so out of respect we’ll delay hiring a replacement and cancel the hundred flights they would otherwise have flown over the coming week.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Dear passengers, we apologize for the delay, but one of our pilots pilot died last week, we all knew them quite well, and we feel really bad about it, so out of respect we’ll delay hiring a replacement and cancel the hundred flights they would otherwise have flown over the coming week.”

Just repeating myself at this point, but here goes, for what it’s worth…

Newsom has time. Her committee is not in session right now, as Congress/House is busy grappling with the last minute voting before the government shuts down, and in the Senate the VP can override any tie by voting herself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Give me a fucking break, Newsom was not her BFF. This is bigger than their feelings. We can’t afford to be down one senator.

If he’s really too emotional to make this decision then he should resign because he’s incapable of doing the job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Newsom was not her BFF.

There’s a range of friendship between not knowing someone, and being BFFs.

If he’s really too emotional to make this decision then he should resign because he’s incapable of doing the job.

Always with the instant extremist opinion / options with you people.

Newsom has time. Her committee is not in session right now, as Congress/House is busy grappling with the last minute voting before the government shuts down, and in the Senate the VP can override any tie by voting herself.

How about he just wants to show some respect, to give people a moment to grieve. She was a big deal in California and San Francisco, even if you personally didn’t like her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

If I were placing a bet, it would be on Shirley Weber, a black woman who Newsom appointed to be SoS when he named Alex Padilla to the US Senate. She’s a former state legislator, and at age 75 a 15 month appointment to the US Senate would be a fine way to cap off her political career, while making good on Newsom’s promise to name a black woman and to appointment a “caretaker” who wouldn’t run for the post.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

love it

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Perfect. It’s not overthinking it, while keeping a promise, and not rebuffing anyone who wants to or is already running for the seat. I hope he doesn’t fuck this up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Ageism is wonderful. Maybe we should just shoot everyone over 30?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

There is undoubtedly an age where you are wise enough to lead a country. But there is also an age where you will statistically either die soon or become unable to handle your tasks in high ranking position. And for some positions that’s compromising.

We’re not calling them out for being old, we’re noticing that there’s an upper bound age that causes a huge number of problems in these positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If we’re going to do something like that can we go full Logan’s Run and have a Carousel and orgies and everything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Let’s not pretend that anyone over the age of 70 immediately becomes mentally incompetent. That’s not only ridiculous it’s insulting. These things should be taken on a Case by case basis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Let’s not pretend that anyone over the age of 70 immediately becomes mentally incompetent. That’s not only ridiculous it’s insulting. These things should be taken on a Case by case basis.

It’s also Ageist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But also let’s not assume they are too. Competency tests exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And then she stays for next 30+ years…

I’m joking, that sounds reasonable and would also fit his statement that he won’t pick up either of the running candidate to not tip the scale and to not tip it would have to be somebody who won’t run next year. So as long as she guarantees that she won’t run, then indeed she sounds like a great choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Bids must still be coming in.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments