ChapulinColorado

Forgot: “Nintendo is suing all of them!”

Sometimes what you were going to comment is already there, you updoot and move along.

I was wondering how all those Sony games worked on GOG.

“Only 20 people have been sliced like ham so far Lucious”

“Don’t we have a PR firm to put a positive spin on it?”

“Use one of our fairytale non-profits!”

I someone that has not played halo before I was wondering if the beer belly energy was supposed to be part of the character.

That sounds more like someone that would deffend the cyber truck I suppose.

Plus on many occasions they go with the lowest bidder for the sake of appearances. I remember a company I used to work for went with a very unrealistic low bid to get their foot in the door and then get the maintenance contract that came after implementation.

The project went as well as you’d expect with such a low budget. Experienced people left due to long working hours, unrealistic client expectations and no budget for any quality of life improvements available (I was one of them). The company lost the maintenance bid and will likely lose the best people they still have to the new company taking over the contract.

Or that with 2 of the same polarity you’d get some 😋🍑

Replacement electric toothbrush heads run on the same scheme as disposable razors with high margins and vendor lock in. I’ve also seen vendors (Phillips) change the design to force you to buy another base station/brush.

This could only lead to a hostile work environment. The process and checks in it is what needs to be questioned. If it came out it was an executive bypassing process, then yes. Otherwise the process can be updated and improved. It also needs to be publicly disclosed why it happened given the nature of the claims.