abrams still around in pokrovsk area, and leopards around in several areas.

On the contrary. Tanks, like any other system, will take losses.

Being able to replace material losses while avoiding and replacing personnel losses is a key part of any long conflict.

Russia constantly taking ground: is this a stalemate?

At least we eat dirt, China don’t eat, they survive on the power of juche

Liberalism doesn’t believe in guardrails for capitalism. That would be socialdemocracy or specifically social liberalism.

Liberals as a whole refer to uncontrolled economics, at most having some tax funded social policies.

Radio free America.

Fighter bomber planes are nothing new tbh

It does lol. Two seater.

The peace deals were reportedly off the table for good after Ukraine started its incursions in Russia in Feb 2024 after losing avdeevka.

Ukraine has sealed its fate now, probably for the better of natives in these areas.

They will at least lose sumy, kharkov, donbass, zaporozhye and kherson. And accept that they lost crimea long ago. And probably they should be happy they won’t lose dnipropetrovsk and nikolayev.

The reaction to kursk will not be flashy. It will simply be another cold change of rules.

New targets targeted by cruise missiles, harsher terms for Ukrainian surrender.

We saw this after Ukraine took advantage of Russian withdrawal from kiev breaking the tacit agreement of having peace talks in exchange for the withdrawal. Russia kept attacking and stopped accepting peace talks where Ukraine doesnt accept their terms.

We saw this after Ukraine retook kharkov and attacked the kerch bridge (crimea was not part of the fighting area). Russia started punishing Ukrainian power transmission capacity.