I read a dictionary entry and maybe skimmed a Wikipedia article and thus am an expert and qualified to discuss things I’m wholly ignorant of.

I. NO INVESTIGATION, NO RIGHT TO SPEAK

Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn’t that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep his eyes shut and talk nonsense?

It won’ t do!
It won’t do!
You must investigate!
You must not talk nonsense!

Please. I’m begging you. Go to your local community/junior college, find a class in Philosophy and enroll in it. Take a class in political science. Engage in these subjects deeper than surface level. Actually try to internalize and understand these subjects. It will improve your life in many ways.

Millennials making sounds like a bobcat being swung around in a pillow case

I bought black licorice at the store and the cashier called it disgusting. I don’t care, I’ll keep eating that garbage.

US/EU won’t import clothes made with Xinjiang cotton, and China makes clothes. In order to export clothes made of cotton to US/EU, they have to import cotton from abroad to make clothes without Xinjiang cotton.

In that case,

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps and First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Ben Key were both on board the submarine during the test, according to the newspaper.

A fucking comic book rank

The whole concept of Judicial Review is unconstitutional. There is nothing about it in the US constitution, it was decided by the Supreme Court in an early ruling that they had the authority and no one said “no.”

It’s objectification. You are reducing another human being into an object whose only characteristic is whether or not you’d fuck them.

Commenting on someone’s fashion choices, how they’ve styled their hair, how they’ve chosen to present themselves, etc is normally not objectifying, as those are choices that person made. Saying, “that person is pretty/handsome/beautiful” is closer to objectifying but is more dependent on the rest of the context. But saying “I’d fuck her” is objectification.

This isn’t Puritanism, it’s about seeing other human beings as human beings and not a hole to fuck.

The entire concept of generations was invented to complain about young people. The only real generational cohort was the post world war 2 baby boom.

Yeah, just avoid the comments