Why do I only see people talking about the graphics but either never mention gameplay or say it’s too mundane or dull and not worth the hours to get through it?

I see it a lot used as a benchmark but no or very little mention of replay value.

I’m watching game play of it, it seems to be a bit different. Does it have lower end hardware requirements, based on how the graphics looks?

With a BIOS update for the motherboard, does it support 9th gen?

Cultic looks alright, I have a hard time with the low end graphics, but that’s my personal preferance.

der8auer only saw a minor decrease on PCI-E 3.0 board. https://yewtu.be/watch?v=uU5jYCgnT7s

It could also be that with nVidia making billions from AI computing, it doesn’t hurt them if graphics cards don’t sell because they own the market anyways, it doesn’t matter. If Radeon sales increase but they still make billions from the enterprise, it still doesn’t matter. And Intel doesn’t exist in that space.

Given that nVidia is a trillion dollar company even with Ada Lovelace not selling, the company is not being affected. Why sell an $800 card when they can sell a $5000 card?

Gamers need to accept that if gaming GPU’s don’t sell yet the company has billions of dollars coming in, they have no reason to listen or care about gamers. I strongly condemn nVidia’s corporatist attitude, but gamers have to either pay nVidia prices or buy from a different company while nVidia continues to get richer without gamers.

That’s on PC?

I have it, I started it for maybe an hour, I have no idea how the rest of it is.

There’s nothing stopping me from downloading it again and continuing the campaign.

Remember when the 1080 Ti was $700?

Zero. I do not tip anywhere, regardless of good service which is their job to do, and for bad service I do not go back again.