User's banner
Avatar

Pandantic [they/them]

Pandantic@midwest.social
Joined
203 posts • 1.8K comments
Direct message

It bothers me that this article calls Epstein “the disgraced financier” instead of “the human trafficker”.

permalink
report
reply

It sounds pretty discriminatory saying that they’re too dumb to list the candidates they want in order. It’s not a difficult premise.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy.world is turning vanilla. They closed the shrooms community too!

permalink
report
reply

However, he is crossing 3 state lines in the process, breaking federal law.

permalink
report
reply

I liked this at the end of the article:

The Washington Post estimated that during his presidency, Trump made more than 30,000 false or misleading statements.

permalink
report
reply

Stupid sexy Descartes!

permalink
report
reply

Did I miss it? Was there a reason given or is it just the new “conservative coalition” doesn’t like it?

permalink
report
reply

I’ve been arguing with a user on .world about how hexbear is not transphobic and the pronouns aren’t “blatant mockery of trans people”. When I told them they were wrong, they said hexbear is “typical online terrorists”, putting the pronouns then going around posting “racist, bigoted” stuff. I’m waiting for proof of such posts. 😋

permalink
report
parent
reply

The judge said the evidence did not establish Tickle was excluded from Giggle directly “by reason of her gender identity although it remains possible that this was the real but unproven reason”.

Rather, the indirect discrimination case succeeded because Tickle was excluded from the use of the social media app “because she did not look sufficiently female”.

And yet…

Grover [app’s maker] told the court that she would not address Tickle as “Ms” and that, even if a transgender woman presented as female, had gender affirmation surgery, lived as a female and held female identity documents, Grover would still see her as a “biological male”.

Sounds like literal discrimination by her gender identity to me. If Grover said this in court, displayed this in court, how could there be any doubt?

permalink
report
reply